Item GlossaryEverQuest icon

Frayed Ethereal Drape  

AC: 10
INT: +6 MANA: +15
WT: 2.0 Size: SMALL
Slot 1, Type 7 (General: Group)
Slot 2, Type 21 (Special Ornamentation)
Item Lore:Frayed Ethereal Drape of Luclin
Item Type:Armor
Appearance:Cryosilk Robe
Color (RGB):35, 35, 35
Lucy Entry By:Kerasota
Item Updated By:SwiftyMUSE
IC Last Updated:2020-06-19 12:45:54
Page Updated:Thu Oct 9th, 2008
Shadows of Luclin Item

Rarity: Common
Level to Attain: 45

[Comments ]

This item is the result of a quest.

Zone(s) Found In:

Uploaded November 27th, 2008
Send a correction
Post Comment
#REDACTED, Posted: Aug 28 2002 at 7:45 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) WHAT IS VI THINKING!!!? What caster about lvl 40 would wear this robe? NONE why 10 AC 6INT give me a break this is a 20 to 40 robe if i ever saw one. Again VI screws the mid lvl people
RE: Why would
# Sep 11 2002 at 3:18 PM Rating: Decent
People are so jaded these days, back in the old days, a robe with 6 int, 15 mana and 10 MR was considered level 50 loot. Nowadays you get people like this one complaining about it. I was wearing the flowing black robes from najena up until level 35ish then I got my robe of the oracle... robe of the oracle has 5 int and 25 mana on it. Only slightly better than this robe in the mana department but no MR. Almost every robe with around 6 int is from level 35+ mobs. You aren't going to top that.

Korin MoonDragn
Tarew Marr

Edited, Wed Sep 11 16:13:59 2002
#REDACTED, Posted: Jan 27 2004 at 9:57 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) My Level 6 Froglok Wizard wears Shaderock Robe
RE: Why would
# Sep 10 2002 at 6:21 PM Rating: Decent
Actually I would say this isn't a bad high level cloak. Once you get around 58-60 you will most likely have int maxed and you can work on other important stats like mana, ac, and saves.
RE: Why would
# Sep 11 2002 at 3:29 PM Rating: Default
its not a cloak its a robe
RE: Why would
# Jan 27 2003 at 7:23 AM Rating: Default
569 posts
You forgot to capitalize your "I" at the beginning of your sentence, put an apostrophe between your "t" and "s" in "it's" in both occurences of the word "its", and you forgot to put a period at the end of your sentence.


# May 06 2002 at 4:53 PM Rating: Decent
For people without Luclin and the graphics of course, it looks like a Tattered Tomb shroud.
# Apr 20 2002 at 11:25 AM Rating: Default
RE: Pic
# Apr 30 2002 at 5:46 PM Rating: Decent
41 posts
Here is a pic of an Inny Dark Elf Male Mage wearing one. Same base graphic as Cyrstalline Robe, just darker.

Edited, Fri May 3 01:07:50 2002
Looking good
# Dec 23 2001 at 1:45 PM Rating: Decent
4 posts
So does anyone have a pic of what it looks like?
#REDACTED, Posted: Dec 20 2001 at 11:47 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) only 10ac, 2wt and mana bonuses? Why would a Monk waste his time getting this? The +10 svMagic? That's hardly worth getting something so heavy for Monks. At least I hope no one seriously claims this is a "Monk item". Heh
RE: Don't see any monks getting this...
# Jan 06 2002 at 4:29 PM Rating: Decent
While this may not be a piece of equip that a monk would wear into combat, it's not without it uses. My monk regularly practices trade skills and the +6 INT bonus would definately help reduce the time it takes to increase those skills.
Who knows, maybe if the rest of their armor is light enough the +10 vs. magic might be enough to compensate for the 2 stone weight. Plus keep in mind that as a monk gets higher in level the amount of weight they can carry without penalty also increases.
RE: Don't see any monks getting this...
# May 16 2002 at 10:47 AM Rating: Decent
The TERM Stones comes from BETA. Verant called the weight system stones instead of pounds. JUST because there is a real life weight called stones, does not mean it applies to EQ. IT IS A GAME..!! What do you want them to call the weight system, rats asses..??

*** How much does your sword weight? WOW, only 5 rats asses, not bad..!!***
#REDACTED, Posted: Mar 11 2002 at 12:27 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) MINI RANT:
RE: Don't see any monks getting this...
# Mar 31 2002 at 2:30 AM Rating: Decent
Because Verant referred to the weight unit as a stone somewhere, and because it sounds lame to say "this item weighs 2.0 units". This is a fantasy RPG, and "units" just doesn't have the right ring to it.
RE: Don't see any monks getting this...
# Mar 27 2002 at 6:44 PM Rating: Default
I totally agree. A 'stone' is 14 pounds, or 6.4 kg. I just looked it up.
RE: Don't see any monks getting this...
# Mar 11 2002 at 10:04 AM Rating: Default
Maybe stone doesn't refer to an actual stone. There are many words with multiple meanings and stone could just be the weight unit in eq.
#REDACTED, Posted: Dec 21 2001 at 1:31 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Same reason monks wear Oracle and Guardian robe...
Post Comment

Free account required to post

You must log in or create an account to post messages.