Item GlossaryEverQuest icon

Primal Velium War Lance  

Skill: 2H Piercing Atk Delay: 44
DMG: 45 Dmg Bonus: 135 AC: 17
This item is placeable in yards, guild yards, houses and guild halls.
STR: +8 DEX: +8 STA: +8 CHA: +8 WIS: +8 INT: +8 AGI: +8 HP: +75 MANA: +75 ENDUR: +75
Required level of 55.
Effect: Avatar (Combat, Casting Time: Instant)
WT: 2.5 Size: LARGE
Race: ALL
Slot 1, Type 4 (Weapon: General)
Slot 2, Type 20 (Ornamentation)

Item Type:2H Piercing
Lucy Entry By:Tiana
Item Updated By:SwiftyMUSE
IC Last Updated:2021-12-22 03:08:44
Page Updated:Thu Oct 9th, 2008

Expansion: Scars of Velious Scars of Velious

Rarity: Rare
Level to Attain: 55

[Drops | Comments ]


This item is found on creatures.

Zone(s) Found In:

Zone Name
Kerafyrm's Lair (Sleeper's Tomb)

Uploaded November 27th, 2008
Send a correction
Post Comment
#REDACTED, Posted: Oct 31 2002 at 1:32 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) HAVE THESE PRICELESS WEAPONS EVER BEEN LEFT ROTTING ON THE CORPS?
no chance
# Jun 20 2002 at 1:04 PM Rating: Decent
Well as many of you already know...on Fenin Ro the sleeper was woke with the deaths of all the warders so if you are on fenin and dont have one never will.....

WTF was OOR and TMO thinking???
RE: no chance
# Jun 20 2002 at 5:19 PM Rating: Decent
Im not 100% sure but I believe you can still get Primal its just that its drops are even rarer than before.

Ccraxtd Skullz
50 Shaman
Tallon Zek
RE: no chance
# Jun 21 2002 at 10:30 AM Rating: Decent
Primals do still drop, just off of different mobs, and yes, they are rare and coveted.
# Feb 10 2002 at 1:02 AM Rating: Default
This is a super Warrior weapon!!! i am a 33 warrior that cant wait to die a bunch of times to get hehe. Anyway i think a shammy should be able to use this, would be great for them, they can back up main tank with a hit or 2 so as to not draw taunt, and then go back to medding, casting
RE: shammy
# Nov 13 2003 at 8:32 AM Rating: Default
8,619 posts
if there was ever a post by someone who has no idea of the high end game that was it

<back up main tank with a hit or 2 so not to draw aggro, then go back to medding>

hell as a pally my main job these days is to keep aggro off the shammy when he slow's the mob. and god forbid the shammy DoT's to early lol even chain stuns have a hard time then 8o)
Jarkeld Hammerhiem Lvl 36 Paladin/Lvl 30 Armourer
Lestril Hammerhiem Lvl 40 Monk/Lvl 28 Provisioner Blackburrow server
Iaedian Tailchaser lvl 60 Fury/36 Jeweler. Proud member of <Bane> Crushbone server

Your mind is like a Parachute, it only works if it's open.
Poke Away!
# Nov 15 2001 at 6:59 AM Rating: Default
Makes me all warm and fuzyy that i have been training my pierce skill.

Shame its an absolute bind of a place to organise a raid to unless your in an UBER guild :(
Update to stats
# Nov 15 2001 at 2:19 AM Rating: Excellent
This has been upgraded. It is now:

45 dmg / 44 delay
+7 all stats
+7 all resists
+35 hp / mana
+12 AC
stupid rogues
# Oct 04 2001 at 6:18 PM Rating: Decent
I can not stand stupid rogues that are saying i wish i could use this, there is quite a good reason why you cant, cause i dont care what kinda war you got keeping taunt when you have a rogue hitting with a 33 dmg wep every 3.5 sec, and this wepon would crit for like 1000 dmg and then the mob would turn around, laugh at you , smoke you and your almost no hp, then go back to figting the war, thats the reason why rogues cant use wepoons that are 33 dmg 35 dly
RE: stupid rogues
# Jun 12 2002 at 2:09 AM Rating: Decent
image a BS with 45dmg!!!! /drool
BTW rogues aint stupid!
RE: stupid rogues
# Apr 18 2002 at 4:52 PM Rating: Decent
They don't make this for Rogues cause it would just be SCARY. That's why Verant limits rogue piercers to 15 - Anything more would disturb all the other melees out there.
RE: stupid rogues
# Feb 18 2002 at 8:58 PM Rating: Decent
Ever heard of evade skill? Didn't thinks so.
RE: stupid rogues
# Jun 15 2002 at 12:51 PM Rating: Default
Rogues already outdamage everyone in melee (except for a few monks on these boards that say they can outdamage them - i wont get into that arguement so anyway..) with 15dmg for backstab... If they could use this and backstab with it then they would be insanely overpowered
RE: stupid rogues
# Jun 20 2002 at 12:15 PM Rating: Decent
especially with AA ability that they can bs from anywhere. can we say rog cleric chanter group? :)

maybe throw a shaman in there for dex buffs, but you wouldn't need em ;)

Drops from?
# Oct 01 2001 at 8:40 AM Rating: Decent
I see random creatures in the drops from spot, anyone know what exactly it drops from? Are there even any creatures that inhabit sleepers tomb besides The Great Wyrm itself?
# Oct 01 2001 at 8:12 AM Rating: Default
6 posts
Only the Gods Know how much I wish Rogues could use this :P
RE: Hehehehe
# Jun 15 2002 at 12:53 PM Rating: Default
You would freek out at what i would wish then... heh...
#Anonymous, Posted: Oct 01 2001 at 1:54 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) WTF! How come druids can't use this!
#Anonymous, Posted: Nov 04 2001 at 11:05 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) 61st druid?? lol i bet you just started EQ noob... haha everyone knows you can only go upto 60
RE: Wow!
# Jan 22 2002 at 9:17 PM Rating: Default
LOL your stupidity hurts my eyes to read. Its called a joke. Maybe you should stop playing EQ 24/7 and turn on the tv and watch some cc (no not crystal caverns, comedy central) They have some funny stuff. Learn from it.
#REDACTED, Posted: Sep 30 2001 at 5:06 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) eh 2hand pierce that isnt even a skill lol poke someone with two hands look at your skills does this weap go by your 1 hand pierce skill or 2hand slash lol i dont get it 2hand poke heh
RE: weap sucks
# Oct 01 2001 at 12:28 AM Rating: Default
it uses piercing skill it's just that you can't hold anything in tour off hand. doesn't suck look at the ratio it's better than epics
#Anonymous, Posted: Sep 27 2001 at 8:22 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) "Lucky the guy even does this" -- You are correct, however, there'd just be another. Wait, there is!., eqstratics, eqvault,,, etc, etc so on & so fourth.
RE: Lucky?
# Oct 04 2001 at 1:02 PM Rating: Decent
I have to say that Allakhazam's site, it is the BEST one out there. It's not cheap for him to do this, and I know how costly servers can be. I agree whole heartedly with all of you, the guy who posted at the top can just blow off and go elsewhere! All of the good sites will be going to a pay site for sorts. If you think the internet is going to remain "free", your sadly mistaken!

RE: Lucky?
# Sep 30 2001 at 5:14 PM Rating: Good
I hate it when people ***** about getting charged for a great site like this. Don't you realize band width and large quantities of web storage cost money. Domain services cost money. Believing web services are free to the site creators is pure stupidity. Sure a 5Mb site is free. Is this site only 5Mb?
On the same subject... everyone ******* about how much they pay to have yada yada bugs in EQ. Does anyone realize how much it costs to keep even 1 server running for a month. 1 servers internet access alone costs in the 10,000 range.

RE: Lucky?
# Sep 30 2001 at 2:45 AM Rating: Decent
I Can't belive this guy, he sits here being an a** to a guy who spends his time keeping this site up, why does he come to this site then? geez
RE: Lucky?
# Sep 29 2001 at 8:13 AM Rating: Good
19 posts
Everyone has the right to complain, but it is rude to say FU to someone who spends a lot of their time so you can have some information.

Granted it is their choice to spend the time developing and maintaining this sight, it is also your choice to come here. If you have a problem about how he chooses to run it, go somewhere else. Otherwise, stop being such a whiny *****.
#REDACTED, Posted: Sep 28 2001 at 12:08 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Preach on brother, although you must say, the site is quite nice even for the "non-paying" players.
# Sep 27 2001 at 10:20 AM Rating: Default
Now I'm happy I've been working on my SK's piercing skill. I'm really looking forward to poking away at baddies with this sucker from horseback. Just wish you could use these one handed while mounted so you could use a shield, or that you at LEAST got a shield graphic with it while mounted.. Ah well, the sacrifices we make.
# Sep 26 2001 at 10:32 AM Rating: Good
It is very difficult to keep a website going, especially one with as large of a database as this one. Let the guy have some errors!
# Sep 25 2001 at 9:29 PM Rating: Decent
Unless you are a premium member, or donate; don't complain.
I wish Verant had put in more variety than just weapon skill
# Sep 25 2001 at 7:04 PM Rating: Default
Wouldn't it be neat if a Velium Warlance was 68/70, a Velium Battle Axe was 40/42, a Velium Claidhmore was 28/30, etc...

Just wishing.

RE: I wish Verant had put in more variety than just weapon s
# Sep 25 2001 at 7:52 PM Rating: Default
Thats not a bad idea. I wouldn't have a problem but I think verant wants to keep all primal on that 1.060 ratio...
You should all remember
# Sep 25 2001 at 5:39 PM Rating: Decent
2h piercing weapons all use the piercing skill.
Give him a break!
# Sep 25 2001 at 4:39 PM Rating: Decent
Allakhazam has a lot of stuff to do, and I bet he inputs these all really fast, thus the minor errors.

Let him make a few mistakes.
# Sep 25 2001 at 4:17 PM Rating: Decent
89 posts
This weapon has Avatar, it also is a 2hand piercing weapon.
#REDACTED, Posted: Sep 25 2001 at 3:45 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) No Avatar?
RE: Umm???
# Sep 27 2001 at 5:58 PM Rating: Default
They're Right let the guy have his mistakes he does hundreds at a time, AND has a real life. Your lucky the guy even does this
#REDACTED, Posted: Sep 27 2001 at 5:57 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post)
Post Comment

Free account required to post

You must log in or create an account to post messages.