Item GlossaryEverQuest icon

Behemoth's Fangs  
 

Lore Item Placeable
Slot: PRIMARY SECONDARY
Skill: 1H Piercing Atk Delay: 21
DMG: 13 Dmg Bonus: 33 AC: -25
This item is placeable in yards, guild yards, houses and guild halls.
WT: 4.0 Size: TINY
Class: WAR PAL RNG SHD
Race: ALL
Slot 1, Type 4 (Weapon: General)
Slot 2, Type 20 (Ornamentation)

Item Lore:Fangs of Behemoth
Item Type:1H Piercing
Stackable:No
Merchant Value:7 pp 0 gp 0 sp 0 cp
Tribute:1254
Submitted By:Jadae
Lucy Entry By:Mynlaeni
Item Updated By:SwiftyMUSE
Source:Live
IC Last Updated:2021-12-11 01:14:46
Page Updated:Thu Oct 9th, 2008

Expansion: Scars of Velious Scars of Velious


Average Price: 9,500pp Pricing Data...
Rarity: Rare
Level to Attain: 55

[Drops | Comments ]

Drops

This item is found on creatures.

Siren's Grotto
NPC Name
Ulth the Enraged



Zone(s) Found In:


Zone Name
Siren's Grotto

Item Lore: Fangs of Behemoth
Screenshot

Uploaded November 27th, 2008
Send a correction
1 2 Next »
Post Comment
i think you miss the point
# Apr 25 2001 at 6:52 PM Rating: Default
yes this thing is bad!! GREAT


its exactly what everyone has been asking for - a pally/sk piercer that will sell cheap with a low delay for us to practice with

The AC loss wont affect you too much prcticing but you would not want to use for serious battle

A big thankyou to verrant - i just want to see what these things start going for.

Berevon 32nd Paladin of Tunare
Master Smith
Master Fletcher
Master Brewer
I disagree
# Apr 25 2001 at 6:47 PM Rating: Default
Sure, the negative ac would hurt a ranger, if he was soloing, but in a well balanced group (which every 50+ player, not only ranger, should be in), a ranger would kick some major **** with this. This is also much easier to attain then most Epics.

Kalessin
54 ranger
zeb
#Anonymous, Posted: Apr 25 2001 at 6:21 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) No 50+ ranger would use this.
A Ranger sacrifice Melee?
# Apr 25 2001 at 6:13 PM Rating: Default
There's no way a Ranger would use this =) AC is king for Rangers... low AC + innately low hp = insta-death.
#Anonymous, Posted: Apr 25 2001 at 5:44 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) This thing is horrible. I would never sacrifice ac for a 13/21 weapon. Especially when there are epics that you could get at the same lvl.
#Anonymous, Posted: Apr 25 2001 at 5:36 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Ah blah, no rogue use. =(
#Anonymous, Posted: Apr 25 2001 at 5:36 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) By the time you can kill this monster, your will have enough AC to sacrifice 25, better for a rogue though.
RE: Not bad
# Apr 26 2001 at 6:33 PM Rating: Excellent
48 posts
at this lvl, you can't sacrifice any AC, no matter who you are
#REDACTED, Posted: Apr 25 2001 at 5:20 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) THIS SUX ROYAL ****! WTF is with verant? why even make this? its totally gay!
#Anonymous, Posted: Apr 25 2001 at 5:12 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) why did they do this? why why why?!?!?
hmm
# Apr 25 2001 at 5:08 PM Rating: Decent
gotta love the negative ac tho? not!

i doubt warriors will sacrifice the ac... perhaps a rogue or ranger maybe...
RE: hmm
# Apr 25 2001 at 9:44 PM Rating: Decent
There is no way I would pick up a -25 AC item, I don't care how much damage or what the ratio for it is. As a Ranger, I have insanely low HP for a tank. Doesn't matter how much damage you do with a weapon if you don't live long enough to land the shot. Taking a hit like that would be like walking out to a fight without my armored shirt (yeah, that is the kind of hit it gives, only more if you are using anything short of Thorny!). Now, if a Warrior with the high HP's they get isn't gonna do that, what makes you think a Ranger (who is EXTREMELY dependent on AC in a fight just to survive) is gonna pick it up?
#Anonymous, Posted: Apr 25 2001 at 10:24 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) YOU ARE NOT A TANK
RE: hmm
# May 16 2001 at 11:09 PM Rating: Decent
OK, maybe I don't classify as an M1 Tank, but I'm like a Bradley FV... as long as I shoot and move, the Enemy is gonna hurt like blazes. I know that I am not there to absorb the damage, but because of my ability to dual wield and cast (not to mention the class' best weapons are uber fast) the beasties are gonna try and take at least a couple of serious swings at me. AC means that those swings are either not gonna land or at least gonna get softened.

Since the Ranger is a Melee class, AC is king over weapon damage, especially when you have to melee MoB's with big guns (swords, claws, whatever). Anything that subtracts 25 base from my armor rating means that those hits are going to land more often after I attract attention AND hurt more, too. Higher AC means I will live long enough for the main M1 to bring his guns to bear on the MoB and distract him off me (I hope!).

There are times when I will HAVE to deliberately call attention to myself (ie: mob on a caster) because I taunt alot more effectively then a warrior does when you consider that I cast, have fast weapons and taunt into the equation. Those are the times I have to have max AC to live long enough to AGAIN have the warrior save my butt.

In other words, YES, the warriors are THE BOMB. No questions asked. But Rangers have to do a similar job and -25 AC (base) is like painting a bullseye on them and shouting "KILL ME!". So this item doesn't even qualify as mediocre for Rangers.
RE: hmm
# Apr 26 2001 at 8:40 AM Rating: Default
err im playing an iksar warrior they cant wear plate either but u cant say he isnt a tank. sorry to get picky. Ohh but i do agree rangers are not tanx by any means although at lower lvls they are a poor replacement if ur struggling to find a full grp. they do make good pullers tho >8)
*_*
# Apr 25 2001 at 5:04 PM Rating: Default
Wow!!!! Nice item there.. GREAT for warriors it'll help their tanking immensely and only 4 weight!!! piercing rules!!!!
#Anonymous, Posted: Apr 26 2001 at 6:43 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Do you suffer from an attention deficit disorder my friend ? IF YOU READ RIGHT IT SAYS MINUS 25 AC, THAT KILLS TANKS, NO IT WILL NOT HELP A WARRIORS TANKING ABILITY
RE: *_*
# Apr 26 2001 at 12:25 PM Rating: Decent
43 posts
Just a thought, but you may want to look up the word "Sarcasm" in a dictionary. :)

Calbasil Psyrex of Ak'Anon (Terris-Thule)
52nd Illusionist
House of Silmindo
1 2 Next »
Post Comment

Free account required to post

You must log in or create an account to post messages.