Item GlossaryEverQuest icon

Wand of the War Wizard  
 

MAGIC ITEM LORE ITEM PLACEABLE
Slot: PRIMARY SECONDARY
AC: 8
This item is placeable in yards, guild yards, houses and guild halls.
STA: +10 CHA: +5 INT: +9 HP: +50 MANA: +75
SV COLD: +8 SV POISON: +8
Recommended level of 56.
Focus: Anger of Druzzil
WT: 1.0 Size: SMALL
Class: NEC WIZ MAG ENC
Race: ALL
Slot 1, Type 7 (General: Group)
Item Type:Armor
Stackable:No
Tribute:26610
Lucy Entry By:Kerasota
Item Updated By:SwiftyMUSE
Source:Live
IC Last Updated:2021-01-17 08:54:43
Page Updated:Thu Oct 9th, 2008
Planes of Power Item


Average Price: No Data Pricing Data...
Rarity: Common
Level to Attain: 65

[Drops | Comments ]

Drops: This item is found on creatures.

Drunder, Fortress of Zek (Plane of Tactics)


Zone(s) Found In:
Screenshot

Uploaded November 27th, 2008
Send a correction
Post Comment
druzzil
# Mar 04 2004 at 6:17 PM Rating: Default
Anger of Druzzil is spell haste on fire spells i believe. May be wrong but i'm pretty sure it goes Eci=cold haste druzzil=fire. I think there are more like that but dont know the names.
RE: druzzil
# May 08 2004 at 3:27 PM Rating: Decent
*
50 posts
Improved Damage IV = 20% all spell increaser

Anger of E'ci = 23% Ice base spell increaser
Anger of Druzzil = 23% Magic base spell increaser
Anger of Ro = 23% Fire base spell increaser
Anger of Solusek = 25% all spell increaser

Fury of E'ci = 30% Ice base spell increaser
Fury of Druzzil = 30% Magic base spell Increase
Fury of Ro = 30% Fire base spell increaser
Fury of Solusek = 30% all spell increase

Wrath of E'ci = 35% Ice base spell increaser
Wrath of Druzzil = 35% Magic base spell increaser
Wrath of Ro = 35% Fire base spell increaser

Vengeance of Ice = 40% Ice base spell increaser
Vengeance of Magic = 40% Magic base spell increaser
Vengeance of Fire = 40% Fire base spell increaser

Discordant Ice = 45% Ice base spell increaser
http://lucy.allakhazam.com/item.html?id=68913

Discordant Magic/Energy = 45% Magic base spell increaser

Discordant Fire/Flame = 45% Fire base spell increaser

YUM!

Edited, Sun May 9 07:30:42 2004
RE: druzzil
# Mar 18 2004 at 12:48 AM Rating: Excellent
Anger of E'ci = Cold based detrimental spells only
Anger of Druzzil = Magic based detrimental spells only
Anger of Ro = Fire based detrimental spells only
Anger of Solusek = Any detrimental spell
RE: druzzil
# Apr 26 2004 at 10:37 PM Rating: Default
Anger of Druzzil is Magic based 23% dd increaser
Neurotxin
# Jan 25 2004 at 11:26 PM Rating: Decent
LoL, Ihave to say the posts were very amusing but I'm a 65 necro and was curious to whether this effect would be utilized on neurotoxin or life taps etc..
look
# Jan 23 2004 at 11:17 PM Rating: Default
does it have the same look as the blood runed battle wand?

Singdarra
Ok, question....
# Jun 04 2003 at 6:02 AM Rating: Default
Does this stack with any other dmg bonus effects...?? Or is it one or the other...??
RE: Ok, question....
# Sep 20 2003 at 7:01 PM Rating: Decent
No worn focus effects stack in a similar way...

ie whatever Improved Damage focus you have that is highest will take effect.

If you have Mana Pres 3 and Affliction Efficiency 3, both of which reduce mana costs, but MP3 is on almost all spells, whereas AE3 just affects Affliction-type spells... whichever has the highest % of Focus will take hold.

There are some spells and bard songs that will stack with worn focus effects, though.

Anger of E'Ci (worn) + Iceflame of E'Ci (wizard self buff)+ Rizlona's (Bard song) = lots of Damage on Ice Spear of Solist and Ancient: Destruction of Ice =)
RE: Ok, question....
# Oct 04 2003 at 7:13 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
21 posts
Last I checked, Rizlona's doesn't stack with Iceflame of E`ci, since spell-based focus effects don't stack, just like hastes. You can still get the +53% damage from Anger+Iceflame of E`ci.
RE: Ok, question....
# Nov 01 2003 at 8:41 AM Rating: Default
bard songs dont nessicarily count against buffs. IE you can have C5 and wind of marr at the same time and they stack, also you can have 1 haste item, 1 haste buff, and bard haste all stack, so i would guess that they all 3 would stack, havent tested it yet with a bard.
#REDACTED, Posted: Mar 28 2003 at 10:51 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) does it have a fun graphic effect !
if
# Feb 24 2003 at 1:48 AM Rating: Default
you will know if the mob has this because its visible when he does
drop
# Jan 26 2003 at 9:53 AM Rating: Decent
Guild raid last nite...we went int, got killed and needed alot of rezes the first time. we re-grouped, went back in and swept the place. (only a few deaths) well anyway one fo these bad boys dropped. shame its not wiz only, but hey, i haven't seen many people with it soo no difference. The ugly ogre seemed to be aroun lvl 65. he conned yellow to a 63 and to a 64.
P.S. too bad i lost roll, maybe next time

Nukes
63rd wizard

Edited, Sat Aug 9 23:34:13 2003
err...
# Dec 27 2002 at 2:07 AM Rating: Default
You'd think after all of the mag only, pal only, enc only loot they stuffed luclin to the brim with, something named 'Wand of the War Wizard' would be wizard only!
PIC?
# Dec 06 2002 at 1:31 PM Rating: Decent
ANyone have a PIC of this equipped by chance? Was told it has a particle affect as well - and would love to see a screen shot of it.

Shakarr Planeswalker
Erudite Wizard
Brell Serilis
RE: PIC?
# Sep 20 2003 at 7:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Looks like the wand icon in the item window, with little red flames falling off the end.
One should note...
# Nov 17 2002 at 2:20 AM Rating: Excellent
One should note...that the effect only affects magic based spells.
Bah, definitely not from Sword of Truth novels.
# Nov 15 2002 at 11:01 AM Rating: Default
*
93 posts
"War Wizard" is such a generic term, could easily be a coincidence that they put it here.

Besides, in those novels, Richard never uses a wand...do any of the wizards? I don't recall seeing any.
RE: Bah, definitely not from Sword of Truth novels.
# Jan 12 2004 at 2:18 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
633 posts
Kahlan would probably disagree.
RE: Bah, definitely not from Sword of Truth novels.
# Nov 17 2002 at 4:52 PM Rating: Good
They use the term War Wizard because this item drops off a mob that serves The Warlord, Rallos Zek
fashion
# Nov 15 2002 at 9:36 AM Rating: Default
Heh, everybody misses the best thing about this item.

It has a particle effect.
RE: fashion
# Jul 20 2003 at 8:05 AM Rating: Default
U must be kidding!!!
I cant believe what peeps think about looks over usefulness--geesh
however, this item is sweet--but who cares about the looks
RE: fashion
# Nov 15 2002 at 2:59 PM Rating: Default
I have to say that your equipment is sickening :(
j/k nice gear!!
Very nice for an enchanter
# Nov 15 2002 at 8:37 AM Rating: Default
Would love to pick up this item for my enchanter. Plusses to both critical stats, Mana, HP/Sta, AC, and decent save bonuses. The focus effect wouldn't help us too much in the later game (as we are really more for buffing than damage output) but nonetheless it is still really nice. Anyone know how much one of these would go for?
go!
# Nov 15 2002 at 6:49 AM Rating: Default
/agree relios \



and GO RICHARD!! some day maybee the imp order will learn to stop trying to beat richard and just give up :)
Hrm
# Nov 15 2002 at 4:07 AM Rating: Default
Here's a better post than the ones below. Wow a focus effect that's better than any magician made one on an item that isn't half bad to have as an offhand as a caster. Great item. See, no worrying about the name or what it looks like or what it should be.
-
# Nov 14 2002 at 6:48 PM Rating: Default
*
77 posts
Uhh.. a Wand is not normally considered a weapon. A wand would be a finely-tuned magical (short)staff, normally, so this would be a Wand. And as for Wand of the War Wizard, my bet would be that the mob that drops it is the War Wizard...
RE: -
# Nov 15 2002 at 7:42 AM Rating: Default
*
61 posts
I made a mistake while reading your post...I agree though =)

Edited, Fri Nov 15 07:27:49 2002
____________________________
The few, the proud, the non-twink.
#REDACTED, Posted: Nov 14 2002 at 6:15 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Yeah stupid name, never mind the fact for simply wearing this wizards get get nearly 500 extra points of damage for the 2000 dd. And the stats are hlaf bad either.
#REDACTED, Posted: Nov 14 2002 at 6:08 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) VI needs to look at how they name things, with a name like "Want of the War Wizard" I was thinking it would be WIZ only and an uber weapon of like 1HB with 20/20 or something like that. Not some week *** shield!
RE: Name...
# Nov 14 2002 at 8:40 PM Rating: Decent
*
160 posts
Always ones to "borrow" ideas from other well founded fastasy schools, VI has done it again with this one. In Terry Goodkind's Sword of Truth series, the protagonist Richard is a War Wizard. One with both sides of the magical gift. He is the most powerful wizard born in 3000 years, yet he can hardly use his magic most of the time. But his potential for power is untold. Being as how this effect would make a nuker more powerful than someone without the effect, I see the item's name as being quite fitting.
RE: Name...
# Nov 17 2002 at 2:08 AM Rating: Decent
..."War wizard" is indeed a generic fantasy term. Think D&D setting, Forgotten Realms - "the war wizards of Cormyr", to begin with.

*rolls eyes* Duuuh.
RE: Name...
# Nov 15 2002 at 11:06 AM Rating: Decent
God I'm tired of comparing everything Verant does to other fantasy realms out there. Yes, Verant has been guilty of it in the past, but this is not the case. Unless you can prove Terry Goodkind has a patent on the name "War Wizard" I think it just chalks up to Verant using a common fantasy genre term..."Battle Mage" comes to mind as another one.
RE: Name...
# Jan 06 2003 at 7:05 AM Rating: Decent
*
160 posts
Good god people. Everyone is so ready to jump all over a poster and mark their posts down...

Incase your reading comprehension is less than stellar I'll spell it out nice and easy like:

I WAS SAYING THAT IT WAS A GOOD NAME FOR THE ITEM.

Yes VI borrows archetypes and generic fantasy consructs from everywhere, but so does every other game and book, that wasn't the point. I didn't say Goodkind made the term up or that he owns it. I was merely pointing out a well read series in which that term is used in a manner that is comparable to what it means in regards to this item. If that deserves a 1 rating then I quit wasting my time posting here.
Post Comment

Free account required to post

You must log in or create an account to post messages.