Ro's Ink Additive
Runic Parchment
Quill of the Arcanist
Arcane Thickener
Ink of Pain
Trivial is: 351
Source: http://www.eqtraders.com/items/show_item.php?item=21137&menustr=080105140000
Strike of Solusek
|
EQ1: Gooshy: http://eq.magelo.com/profile/1870652
EQ2: Gwenythe: http://u.eq2wire.com/soe/character_detail/468152233422
EQ2: Gwenythe: http://u.eq2wire.com/soe/character_detail/468152233422
11 posts
Possible Bug is going around been seeing Wizards Crit for almost 10k with SoS on Grummus today on Bertoxxolous server today. Not sure what spell it is but they said was SoS is it even Possible?
Jamasua 65 Arcanist
Jamasua 65 Arcanist
2750 dmg
+ 45% worn impoved damgage
+ 20% improved damage from god flappys /bard song
= 4537 damage
this could crit for almost 10k in my book :)
+ 45% worn impoved damgage
+ 20% improved damage from god flappys /bard song
= 4537 damage
this could crit for almost 10k in my book :)
Yes, it should be possible -- crit only multiplies base damage not extra due to self focusing so with the 45% worn and 20% buff focus it'd be 7946 damage on fully AA'd crit. Now if the druid 1.5 was added it'd hit for 10330 max and druid 2.0 would be 11919 max -- those numbers assume that the druid epic focus debuff stacks with all personal focuses (buff and worn) and affects the full critted DD not just the base damage like personal focuses do. If druid epic focus debuff does only affect base damage then with 1.5 it'd be 8768 max and with 2.0 it'd be 9316.
15 posts
plus you get AA to increas crit damage by up to 25% I think it is.
So max crit would be
4537 x 2.25 = 10276 (rounding up from 10275.75)
So max crit would be
4537 x 2.25 = 10276 (rounding up from 10275.75)
11 posts
Possible Bug is going around been seeing Wizards Crit for almost 10k with SoS on Grummus today on Bertoxxolous server today. Not sure what spell it is but they said was SoS is it even Possible?
Jamasua 65 Arcanist
Jamasua 65 Arcanist
I would like to share some thoughs I was having about SoS efficiency:
As proven, SCM3 + Specialization at 200 saves 20% of all mana
http://pub140.ezboard.com/fgraffeswizardcompilationfrm28.showMessage?topicID=23.topic
And, with Wizard Elemental Gloves we have a Preservation of 25% that stack with Specialization checks.
With Wizard Elemental Robe, or similar 35% nuke damage increase we have 3699 damage with no crits for this spell.
Now onto the math:
Mana Cost:
640 - Unadjusted
640 - 128 = 512 with specialization and SCM3
512 - 128 = 384 from saving of Inferno of Sol (25% MP)
Now we have a 3699 spell for 384mana, achieving a ratio of 9,63.
Not counting crits ! :)
Pretty impressive hehe
As proven, SCM3 + Specialization at 200 saves 20% of all mana
http://pub140.ezboard.com/fgraffeswizardcompilationfrm28.showMessage?topicID=23.topic
And, with Wizard Elemental Gloves we have a Preservation of 25% that stack with Specialization checks.
With Wizard Elemental Robe, or similar 35% nuke damage increase we have 3699 damage with no crits for this spell.
Now onto the math:
Mana Cost:
640 - Unadjusted
640 - 128 = 512 with specialization and SCM3
512 - 128 = 384 from saving of Inferno of Sol (25% MP)
Now we have a 3699 spell for 384mana, achieving a ratio of 9,63.
Not counting crits ! :)
Pretty impressive hehe
Put that in a 7200 mana pool with FT beyond count + VoQ
Now, did someone say Wizards aren't the masters of DPS? :P
Now, did someone say Wizards aren't the masters of DPS? :P
The focus on the elemental robe is random 1-35%, not 35%, so you'll end up averaging 17% focus damage bonus.
Think he was talking best-case scenario...
1 post
Don't be misinformed, it is simple math.
2305(dmg of AT)/580(mana of AT)=3.97(dmg/mana)
2740(dmg of SoS)/640(mana of SoS)=4.28(dmg/mana)
4.28>3.97
So therefore, SoS has a better mana ratio than AT.
2305(dmg of AT)/580(mana of AT)=3.97(dmg/mana)
2740(dmg of SoS)/640(mana of SoS)=4.28(dmg/mana)
4.28>3.97
So therefore, SoS has a better mana ratio than AT.
#REDACTED,
Posted: Jun 03 2003 at 9:46 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) yea sorry i was mis informed didn't actually look or do the math actually. thank you for clarifying that and giving the right information
Mana Wise this spell is much better
GSS = 3.88 damage per mana point
Strike of Sulesk= 4.28 damage per mana point
Much better
GSS = 3.88 damage per mana point
Strike of Sulesk= 4.28 damage per mana point
Much better
This spell is 40 more mana but like 600 more dmg it's way better than GSS
Edited, Mon Apr 7 14:33:13 2003
Edited, Mon Apr 7 14:33:13 2003
How good is this spell compared to GSS?
Free account required to post
You must log in or create an account to post messages.© 2024 Fanbyte LLC