Cleric Epic Riddles

SOE sent us some more riddles. This time for the Cleric Epic. There are two of them. Rather than making two posts, I'll post them both below and then post the answers later. Riddle No 1. "I was struck with iron at birth, and again and again throughout life." "I have seen many battles and witnessed terrible strife." "Even when victorious, I'll emerge battered and thrashed." "For every time I'm wounded, another is saved from the pyre ash." Riddle No. 2 "What has outlived the Gods but has never been seen, And the more there is of it, the less there will be?"

Comments

« Previous 1 2
Post Comment
Name?
# Sep 08 2004 at 8:45 AM Rating: Default
Unswerving Shield of Life, Bulwark of Time, Kite Shield of Death, Rusty Shield of Craptacularness, whatever. All I know is that bish better have some mana regen on it, otherwise I'm probably just going to get an Aegis of Blackscales :-P

Just a thought
# Sep 02 2004 at 7:06 AM Rating: Decent
Riddle No 1.

"I was struck with iron at birth, and again and again throughout life."
Indicates it could be anything from a weapon to armor or a shield (Because those of you who say it can't be a shield a metal shield is beaten into form)
"I have seen many battles and witnessed terrible strife."
Again this further indicates that it is armor or shield or a weapon
"Even when victorious, I'll emerge battered and thrashed."
But this, This Is one of the main lines, Battered and Thrashed = Shield Most Likely, Because what do you want to get battered and thrashed, Your Shield, Not your breastplate, or Helm, Your Shield.
"For every time I'm wounded, another is saved from the pyre ash."
I think this Indicates a damage shield, or the first "Procing" shield, Maybe it heals the group when something hits you, Just a thought.
Riddle No. 2

"What has outlived the Gods but has never been seen, And the more there is of it, the less there will be?"
I agree with most with Time or Death

So this Could possibly mean

Shield of Time/Death,
AC=?
Stats=?
DS (Possibly)

Effect: Heal all (hehe)
RE: Just a thought
# Sep 05 2004 at 5:55 AM Rating: Default
Armor can be Thrashed and Battered, but yes so can a shield. But for the sake of History how many shields have survived time? More suits of battered armor have surfaced than shields. I beaten shield if anyone has ever hefted a shield before would require someone with a dwarven physique to use. Kite shield for example were planted on the ground or linked and used as protection from burning oil and arrows, but never weilded in combat. Hold a Kite shield and swing a 15 to 25 lbs Sword or mace. 30 Seconds later tell me you'd use a metal shield repeatively in battle. Sorry but despite those pics/sketches I'd still go with Armor or some sort. As to Life, Death, Time or Faith well... Faith is a good clerical answer as is Life, but Daeth is a Necro Item and Time ??? Armor of Time? Armor of Faith sounds better, but I agree with the Proc Effect.... maybe it's Armor that is like the Cleric Spell "Mark of the Righteous" Each time a Mob Hits you it heals a portion of the damage to everyone. Thus a mob hitting the cleric for 400 would perhaps heal everyone in the group by 50hps, the more it gets hit the more it heals? Taking Elementalfenix's idea and expanding on it.
Riddle 2
# Aug 31 2004 at 5:30 PM Rating: Decent
If this dupes sorry i had posted annon earlier. But the answer could be life. As everything grows older it nears death and its life shortens.
Riddle #2
# Aug 31 2004 at 12:36 PM Rating: Decent
Would the answer to riddle 2 be time?
It is a sheild
# Aug 31 2004 at 11:56 AM Rating: Decent
The new cleric epic 2.0 is a sheild here is the lin to all the epics for all classes.

http://www.wickedages.com/epics.jpg
RE: It is a sheild
# Aug 31 2004 at 3:48 PM Rating: Default
Verified, ... saw several of these from the EQ booth @GenCon Indy. August 19-22, 2004. But, they are just concept from what we were told.
Riddles
# Aug 31 2004 at 10:58 AM Rating: Decent
After reviewing the answers thus far, I beleive that those that chose the Shield for #1 are correct.

But those that chose "Nothing", may not be correct.

I would like to say it is "Death".

The more Death that there is, the less Death there can be. As for the part of the Gods, who outlives the Gods? Death.

Just my 2 cp worth.
Riddle #1
# Aug 31 2004 at 9:31 AM Rating: Decent
I propose that the answer to the first riddle is a Staff of Wood. It answers all the questions and in particular the 4th part.

"For every time I'm wounded, another is saved from the pyre ash."

When the staff is broken (wounded), another piece of wood is saved from the fire.
RE: Riddle #1
# Sep 07 2004 at 8:54 PM Rating: Decent
Possibly, but I read it as every time a shield is hit it saves the life of the person holding it. Thus keeping the cleric off their own funeral pyre.
Hammer and Shield
# Aug 31 2004 at 7:23 AM Rating: Good
#1 Shield - for the reasons given
#2 Nothing - for the reasons given

Conclusion-A Shield out of nothing - an Unswerving Shield to go with the unwerving hammer. Possibly with a defense damage proc.
Hammer and Shield
# Aug 31 2004 at 7:19 AM Rating: Decent


Edited, Tue Aug 31 08:29:57 2004
An epiphony!
# Aug 31 2004 at 5:18 AM Rating: Good
21 posts
I've been really thinking the second riddle over in my head. All this time I think that death is a very viable answer, but the more I thought about it, I thought that "nothing" was also just as viable. But then I backed up and looked at the bigger picture.

In that riddle alone, nothing is a completely acceptable answer, but since both riddles are about the same object, it gives us clues. Nothing cannot be the answer. Nothing cannot be struck by iron, and nothing is not born. Nothing cannot protect someone from injury. the answer cannot be nothing because the first riddle states the fact that it is something.

I doubt that it wouldn't have anything for an ability or that you wouldn't have to do anything to get it as well.

***edit***

But I'll tell you one thing; If they don't give me an answer soon, I'm going to explode with anticipation!

Edited, Tue Aug 31 06:44:05 2004
PIE
# Aug 30 2004 at 5:00 PM Rating: Default
YUMM PIE
PIE IS GOOD
YUMMM PIE
Not Sword
# Aug 30 2004 at 4:55 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
#1 is a Sword
#2 is Nothing

Although #1 could be armor or a sheild, the last line kind of says once its broke another will be forged. Armor and Sheilds can be repaired, Swords can not. You have too melt them down again and start from the beginning.

And I have too agree with Qaanol and skizophrenik on #2. If you have more of something then someone else would have less. And I would think that would also go with the opposite being Nothing.

take it for it's worth, just my thoughts on the subject.


Your #1 is not reasonable in that:
A) Clerics can not use a sword and
B) The Cleric already has an "Epic" weapon

It is more reasonable for it to be a sheild or piece of armor because it has been said that both 1.0 and 2.0 can be used to compliment each other.


Just my 2 cp

Cenamyen
riddle #2
# Aug 30 2004 at 3:13 PM Rating: Decent
"What has outlived the Gods but has never been seen, And the more there is of it, the less there will be?"

The past. Time passes and is gone, but the past is forevermore.

and shield for #1
RE: riddle #2
# Aug 31 2004 at 10:39 AM Rating: Default
Ah but the future extends out into infinity and thus there is always more time ahead of you then behind you since there is no end to infinity.
Hmmm
# Aug 30 2004 at 7:29 AM Rating: Default
I think it's Pie...I like Pie
Riddle me this...
# Aug 30 2004 at 7:01 AM Rating: Default
1) Shield

Why shield rather than any other piece of armor? Because the last line implies that this object stands in the way to take the blows so the person it is protecting doesn't get hit. Every piece of armor does that, but while you could call every piece of armor a type of "shield" designed to protect a specific part of the body, you can't call a shield a "helmet" or a "breastplate" or whatever.

2) Nothing/Nothingness

Why? Because this is one of the oldest riddles in the world. Any scholar could find a riddle that translates roughly this way in works that are ancient, like the Zohar or the Upanishads. The answer hasn't changed from culture to culture and era to era, so I'm going to guess that while SOE insterted the predicating "Gods" line, they probably left the basic riddle answer alone.
#REDACTED, Posted: Aug 30 2004 at 7:16 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Once again, shields are crafted items, not born through a forging process. Shields are bound and strapped or simply molded, as for the word shield; a shield is a barrier, a barrier is a wall, etc... And as for nothing or nothingness you are using a double negative.
RE: Riddle me this...
# Aug 30 2004 at 1:05 PM Rating: Good
A shield can be crafted or forged. How do you plan on crafting a metal shield. It can go through a similar process much like any common weapon can. Everybody knows the answers are probably 'shield' and 'nothing' (possibly 'death'). If you're debunking the poster with talk of double-negatives, where are your riddle answers?
Faith
# Aug 30 2004 at 6:37 AM Rating: Default
The more there is of it, the less there will be? I would say the answer to this is Faith. The more of the faithful there are the less unbelievers there can be. Note the line does not say "The more there is of it, the less of it there will be." It could be a piece of armor but I tend to believe the item will be a shield. A shield is an active defender. Armor is passive.
RE: Faith
# Aug 30 2004 at 6:47 AM Rating: Default
Can't be Faith. And the more there is of it, the less there will be? The more faith there is, the less faith there will be? Faith dies with worshipors, saying Faith would mean eventually faith will end. Time on the other hand... the past always out does the future, we all have a long past but a short future. Everything that happens thus becomes the past and gives less to the future.
RE: Faith
# Aug 31 2004 at 10:30 AM Rating: Default
Dynamite you are not reading the question correctly. What has outlived the Gods but never been seen? Faith cannot be seen. And it has outlived the Gods, both in real life and in this RPG. People had faith in different religions throughout human history and the gods throughout human history have changed.

But the real kicker is this line. "And the more of it there is, THE LESS THERE WILL BE." Note this does not say "The more of it there is, the less of it there will be." Lets say there are 1000 people. 100 of those people have faith in X. That leaves 900 unbelievers. Now if 50 people convert, that means there are now 150 people with faith "The more of it there is" and now only 850 unbelievers "The less there will be"
RE: Faith
# Aug 31 2004 at 10:36 AM Rating: Default
Also Dynamite you assume time is a finite. There is no reason to assume that at all. Time in the abstract is usually considered infinite.
RE: Faith
# Sep 05 2004 at 5:37 AM Rating: Default
Time whether Finite or Infinite can be also said of Faith, is faith Finite or Infinite? But the more time that passes creates a larger past. The future whether finite or inifinite goes like this, There is proof of Past but can anyone say with 100% certainty that there will be tomorrow? Faith says there will be but is there proof that tomorrow exists? Time to our concept has a finite meaning the older we get the less life we have. Again a paradox Time, Faith and Life all equate here, on the pessimistic side the closer to death we are the less death effects us. Is death final? Again is there proof that Death is the end of Life or is it a concept beyond human understanding?
Analyze This !
# Aug 30 2004 at 6:26 AM Rating: Default
1) I was struck with iron at birth, and again and again throughout life. (denotes a forged item) Shields are crafted and bound typically not forged. This could mean armor or a weapon.

2) I have seen many battles and witnessed terrible strife. Again emphasizes either a weapon or armor.

3) Even when victorious, I'll emerge battered and thrashed. Weapons, Helmets, Breastplates or any armor piece. All these items require fixing after a battle.

4) For every time I'm wounded, another is saved from the pyre ash. "for every time I am wounded, another is saved from death" This seems to imply a defensive item. "I'd guess it's BreastPlate/Armor, shields typically are destroyed and rarely see numerous battles or given that this is a fantasy game a Golem, but Sony isn't that devious" So perhaps "Armor" is the first answer.

Second part:

"What has outlived the Gods but has never been seen, And the more there is of it, the less there will be?"
Possible answers: Time & Air. It can't be Life or Death both can be seen. Whatever the answer is, it is something that is consumed in some sort of a fashion. "Time or Air" Most likely Time since Air is a Magician's element. So Time is my guess.

So I would think the answer might be "Armor of Time".


Edited, Mon Aug 30 07:39:00 2004
RE: Analyze This !
# Aug 30 2004 at 10:50 AM Rating: Good
Actually, if it is "Struck with Iron at Birth" it can indeed be a metal shield. A metal shield is beaten into form, much like a sword. The metal is beaten, folded, cooled and then beaten, folded and cooled again. That is how, I believe, samurai swords are made. The pieces of metal for a strong shield are assembled and joined. This is the actual making of the shield, but this step also needs a hammer to accomplish. Therefore, a Shield is a very logical answer. Also, a shield is more likely to take abuse than ones armor in battle. A victorious warrior seeks to keep blows at bay with the shield and not his armor.

Also, a shield is a singular object, while, in EQ, armor has often come in full sets. We never had Skyshrine shields, Ornate shields et cetera.
I have changed my opinion
# Aug 29 2004 at 10:57 PM Rating: Decent
I agree with Darkelder. Shield and Death seem the most fitting answers, and that leads to a myriad of possibilities for the Cleric Epic. Shield of Death? Shield from Death?
Correction
# Aug 29 2004 at 2:03 PM Rating: Default
Ok, I just wanted to correct al of you guys on something with yuor posts and theories. On riddle #2 you keep says the more ther eis, the less there is, but the riddle ACTUALLY Says "The More there is of it, the less there will be." its not the mroe ther eis, the less there is, its the more there is, the less that there WILL be, plz read carefully before making statements in these riddles.
RE: Correction
# Aug 30 2004 at 1:28 AM Rating: Decent
21 posts
The way it is worded can be taken more than one way. I was exploring the way to which I felt it was refering. Please do not be bossy about your posts. I would appreciate it.
RE: Correction
# Aug 29 2004 at 11:05 PM Rating: Decent
Exactly. That's why I say time. The more time has gone by, the less time there WILL be, once again assuming even time is finite.
Riddles
# Aug 29 2004 at 9:37 AM Rating: Decent
1. I like the idea of a shield for the answer.

2. Ages... has outlived the Gods and never been seen. The more age you have the less you have to go. Related to the time thinking, but just an idea.
RE: Riddles
# Aug 29 2004 at 9:59 AM Rating: Decent
i think its time not ages but untill the come out with answer we never know..could be hot pockets
RE: Riddles
# Aug 31 2004 at 5:27 AM Rating: Decent
21 posts
I like that idea. Shield of Hot Pocket Summoning. Yes, that would be the epic to end all epics.
A New Answer for #2
# Aug 29 2004 at 6:01 AM Rating: Excellent
21 posts
For riddle number one, I will agree with the theory of the shield. Though it could be armor of any sort, I would say that the shield is usually not considered a piece of armor as much as it is dignified as its own class and known for stopping blows before they even reach the armor which itself is known for "chinks" and weaknesses.

Answer #2: Death

For the second riddle I disagree with both theories of Time and Faith. Faith does not make sense with the second part of the riddle. It just is not a definitive answer in all instances. Now anytime I see something in a riddle that says, "The more there is of it, the less there will be" denotes to me a reverse negative such as in the riddle..

"What is greater than God,
More evil than The Devil,
The rich need it,
The poor have it,
And if you eat it you will die?"

The answer to which is of course, nothing. It is the only definitive answer to each line, yet it is nothing at all.

Taking time into the second riddle... The more time there is, the less time there is? That makes no sense at all.

Same with faith; The more faith there is, the less faith there is? No, that is obviously not correct either.

The more nothing there is, the less nothing there is? No, that doesn't make sense.

I say that the answer is death. The more death there is, the less death there can be.

Clerics are directly involved with death. I think this riddle has something to do with the effect of the shield. I doubt it will be a resurrection from death because we already have the sprinkler. I doubt that it will have to do with res effects because that is already covered by the cleric AAs. However, death doesn't necesarily mean killing or the active death of someone. The cleric's arch enemy is of course the undead. Perhaps an AE fear/DD/DoT vs. undead or something of the like. It's a pretty vague riddle, but there is the only logical answer that I can come up with.
RE: A New Answer for #2
# Aug 29 2004 at 2:02 PM Rating: Decent
I think what he is trying to get at is that the more people die, the less people there will be left to die.
RE: A New Answer for #2
# Aug 29 2004 at 2:01 PM Rating: Decent


Edited, Sun Aug 29 15:02:40 2004
RE: A New Answer for #2
# Aug 29 2004 at 12:34 PM Rating: Decent
I think your reason why it cant be time is flawed. Time does make sense for the second part of the riddle ; The more time that has gone by the less time that is left (this is assuming that time is finite).
RE: A New Answer for #2
# Aug 31 2004 at 5:08 AM Rating: Decent
21 posts
Quote:
I think your reason why it cant be time is flawed. Time does make sense for the second part of the riddle ; The more time that has gone by the less time that is left (this is assuming that time is finite).


You can't assume with a riddle, that's why it's flawed.
RE: A New Answer for #2
# Aug 29 2004 at 10:02 AM Rating: Decent
Dont think its death. The more death there is the less death there is? The more death there is the less LIFE there is. /shrug
RE: A New Answer for #2
# Aug 29 2004 at 8:31 AM Rating: Decent
Perhaps an AE fear/DD/DoT vs. undead or something of the like


dear god I hope its not an ae fear/dot...I may not be the best and brightest but I have NEVER used the fear/dot AA as a cleric. Fear just brings back more mobs unless its snared, in which case you probably have a better fearer in the group or at least someone who does it every now and then.

Zaon Theaeon
^65cleric
RE: A New Answer for #2
# Aug 31 2004 at 5:06 AM Rating: Decent
21 posts
Quote:
dear god I hope its not an ae fear/dot...I may not be the best and brightest but I have NEVER used the fear/dot AA as a cleric. Fear just brings back more mobs unless its snared, in which case you probably have a better fearer in the group or at least someone who does it every now and then.


Fear would be bad, but a really nice DD or DoT wouldn't be so bad. Preferrably a DoT to help keep that agro down. That's such a wild guess though.



Edited, Tue Aug 31 06:32:33 2004
Riddle #2
# Aug 28 2004 at 11:46 PM Rating: Decent
Riddle #2 Time

For Riddle #1... going against what the others have said... maybe number 1 is a warrior or something like that? Could be metaphorical.. "Struck with iron at Birth" meaning "Struck with the seed of battle." I don't know

Edited, Sun Aug 29 00:51:35 2004
Riddles
# Aug 28 2004 at 4:21 PM Rating: Decent
#1 is most likely a shield.
#2 is time.

My guess is that you will need a specific shield dropped only in Time as a turn in for Epic 2.0
Riddle answers
# Aug 28 2004 at 4:19 PM Rating: Decent
I think number 1 would be a hammer or a weapon of some sort.. you could look at this in the since of, i kill to save the lives of others, and in that way it could be a weapon by saying everytime i'm wounded another is saved from the pyre ash.
Number 2 i think is either Time or Nothing, nothing makes alot of since if you insert it in the text.. but time makes more since as to the answer.
Cleric epic = shield
# Aug 28 2004 at 12:46 PM Rating: Decent
I heard that the epics 2.0 will be able to be used with your epic 1.0...... the cleric epic has got to be a shield as stated above. That would make the most sence... a weapon (1.0) and a shield (2.0)...

Look at the concept art of the monk epic 2.0. Doesn't look like any weapon i've ever seen. Perhaps all the epic 2.0s are going to not be weapons?
« Previous 1 2
Post Comment

Free account required to post

You must log in or create an account to post messages.