Item GlossaryEverQuest icon

Flesh Eater's Ring  

AC: 12
STR: +7 DEX: +7 STA: +7 CHA: +7 WIS: +7 INT: +7 AGI: +7
Recommended level of 55.
WT: 0.2 Size: TINY
Class: ALL
Race: ALL
Slot 1, Type 7 (General: Group)

Item Type:Armor
Lucy Entry By:Delasa
Item Updated By:SwiftyMUSE
IC Last Updated:2021-07-27 13:02:16
Page Updated:Thu Oct 9th, 2008

Expansion: Lost Dungeons of Norrath Lost Dungeons of Norrath

Average Price: No Data Pricing Data...
Rarity: Common
Level to Attain: 58

[Drops | Comments ]


This item is found on creatures.

Zone(s) Found In:

Zone Name
Mistmoore Catacombs

Uploaded November 27th, 2008
Send a correction
Post Comment
Flesh Eater Ring
# Aug 04 2004 at 7:46 AM Rating: Decent
Two rings dropped back to back last night in a level 60 bbm ldon and I won the roll on the first one. Sadly, as a Druid I will not be wearing this ring because it looks like I will be losing too much mana if I do. So I came here to check on the price and it looks like it will sell for a decent chunk of change. Whoohoo!
# Jun 30 2004 at 12:23 PM Rating: Decent
when they first came out they were 20k. I have one and there is no way I would sell it for 10k, seen as how there are none for sale in The Rathe bazaar. If you learn any thing from economics high demand + limited supply = high price.
Nice ring
# Jun 27 2004 at 9:57 PM Rating: Decent
This sweet little ring dropped tonite but unfortunately I lost out on the roll. Well have to keep trying to win one. 10k+ a little rich for me!
wouldn't hurt my feelings
# Jun 25 2004 at 9:32 PM Rating: Decent
37 posts
it would most certainly not hurt my 61 shammy's feeling to wear this ring. i tend to solo quite a bit, so this would boost all melee stats, AND let me add AC without sacrificing wis. HP? you kidding me? add self buffs, add cle buffs, and pally buffs, and i'm in the same ballpark as an acceptable MT. Not a great tank, mind, but i can and have tank mezzed in the KD arena. ( not by choice mind you, adds can be exciting :P )
and tack on that all/all setting just makes it sweeter.
nay-say all you like, i'm not impressed. this is a good ring.

Zanaabi Gnees
<Celestial Messengers>
61 Oracle
- Zanaabi Rumslayer
- 110 Kitty Shammy of The Nameless... I mean Druzzil Ro.. I mean Xegony! oops.. Test.
- We Dance With No Pants

" Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket?"
Sux when u get too high
# Apr 05 2004 at 7:41 PM Rating: Decent
Guess its to bad when u get at too high level. This is a very nice ring but it is level 58 dungeon if u do not get this ring before your ldon grps start averaging over 58 you cant get it at all then.

"your not pushing yourself to the limit unless you have to go on a cr every now and then."
Gliber 63 pally
Gift from Steward Warden
# Feb 07 2004 at 10:22 PM Rating: Default
Our average lvl 53 group had this drop off Steward Warden during our Hard Collection Adventure today. What a nice "Welcome home from Iraq" present it made for me when I won the random.

PS. In case your wondering, we completed the mission with 3 minutes to spare. Smiley: clap

Freikken Addeicted
<League of Chaos>
Druid 55th
Monk 36th
Warrior 29th
me likes
# Jan 22 2004 at 3:28 PM Rating: Decent
i would be MORE then happy to recive this ring in a LDON valo or no valo good ac for a ring slot +7 to all stats heheh i can do with out a few exta hp's for more ac
RE: me likes
# Apr 05 2004 at 8:27 PM Rating: Default
3,705 posts
This has no HP, no mana, no saves. Valorium ring is better for nearly anyone. With today's gear, its not that hard to max int/wis, and therefore +mana is much better for any caster type. For melees, unless your base stamina is really low, a Fo7 and sta buff should max you, therefore + HP is better than +sta, plus valorium has more sta anyway. Dex and STR on valorium is higher, for dps classes.

This isn't a bad drop, but certainly not better than valorium ring.
# Dec 17 2003 at 7:03 PM Rating: Default
what is the update on this?

lol nm i see it now...Smiley: banghead

Edited, Wed Dec 17 19:04:07 2003
Rangers, Necros and Druids OH MY!

# Dec 16 2003 at 10:26 PM Rating: Default
REAl tough decision valorium and this ring are both real nice....being a melee hmmm higher level AC and HP are important so i opt to go with this ring for a pure melee warrior or monk its good casting melees valorium would be better i think but much debate over this one hehe
best for under 60
# Dec 16 2003 at 11:38 AM Rating: Default
3,128 posts
I think this is better than the valorium ring for those meleers under level 60 as this ring will be full stats at level 55 while the valorium is full stats only at level 60, so a level 58 toon with both such rings will get equal +7 meleers stats. For Hybrids and casters the valorium does not have int or wis, but this ring does. You do lose the Valorium's 65 hp and 40 mana though when using this ring.

Edited, Tue Dec 16 16:19:14 2003
Incorrect data
# Dec 16 2003 at 4:48 AM Rating: Decent
18 posts
The base data on Alla's (but it is correct on Lucy) is missing the CHA +7. This will affect your overall information on your Character Sheet if you have it equipped.

decent ring, good ac
# Nov 15 2003 at 7:00 PM Rating: Decent
We got one of these in a group ranging from level 58-61. I rolled a 195 on it and moved it to my mule since it wasn't an upgrade from the Valorium Ring of Gallantry. When I put up my Trader status, it sold almost instantly at 6k, bought by a level 58 paladin. Guess I shoulda charged more since it sold so fast.

It does lack hard hit points and mana, but I think what draws people to it is the relatively high ac.
#REDACTED, Posted: Oct 20 2003 at 2:20 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I personally can afford to lose 1 in each stat and take the +in ac. For a caster I'd say go with the Valorium but for straight Melle, or Hybrid classes I'd say go with one of these.
Decent ring
# Oct 03 2003 at 3:28 PM Rating: Default
I think this is a great ring. It is almost as good as a Valorium Ring of Gallantry. This has more ac by 5, and only 1 less on all stats. Great bargain since the valorium rings are going for 5 to 8k on my server, Vallon Zek. Had one drop last night and our 64 SK was glad to win roll, replaced his 6ac 65hp ring with this.
RE: Decent ring
# Oct 20 2003 at 1:31 PM Rating: Default
I replaced the same ring on my 59 monk (at the time, dinged 60 yesterday yay!) with this. Took a small hit on hp, but the added stats sure help.

Avg level of my group in mmc was approx 61, the caped vampire fellow that dropped it was a pushover of a wizard type mob. Hardest he hit me was a 750 point nuke, been hit harder than that in Nurga.
# Sep 24 2003 at 5:57 PM Rating: Decent
Not bad :) its alot better than the Velium ring I replace with 0 ac and 7 wis. Im happy
Not bad, At level at best
# Sep 12 2003 at 1:53 PM Rating: Decent
This ring is not bad...however Mana and Hitpoints are lacking. Not bad though.
# Sep 11 2003 at 9:58 AM Rating: Default
Not too shabby for a tradeable ring... prolly gonna be worth a few k, but there are better.
is it just me?
# Sep 11 2003 at 6:06 AM Rating: Default
Or did they forget to put HP's on most of this junk??
RE: is it just me?
# Nov 13 2003 at 11:43 AM Rating: Decent
Thats what the +7 sta is for
RE: is it just me?
# Oct 14 2003 at 3:54 PM Rating: Decent
The + 7 STA will add some hit points. Overall this ring will add a total of 49 points to your base attributes and 12 AC.

Not too shabby.

Best Regards,

Jumgurorm Atrociter
56 Luminary
RE: is it just me?
# Sep 11 2003 at 6:45 AM Rating: Decent
WTF are you talking about? this is great for me hehe im a wizzy and im wearing imbued plat fire ring and velium fire wedding ring or nakis haste ring....7 to stats is a good upgrade for most people
RE: is it just me?
# Sep 26 2003 at 12:40 PM Rating: Decent
There are plenty of items out there with mana/hp. The +7 to most of the other stats IS nice. IMO most of these LDoN items are designed to be an upgrade for most, but by no means equal to items that drop from raid encounters.
Post Comment

Free account required to post

You must log in or create an account to post messages.