Item GlossaryEverQuest icon

Gem of Heroism  
 

Lore Item No Trade Quest Item Placeable
Slot: RANGE
AC: 15
This item is placeable in yards, guild yards, houses and guild halls.
STR: +10 STA: +15 WIS: +5 INT: +5 HP: +75 MANA: +75
SV FIRE: +5 SV DISEASE: +5 SV COLD: +5 SV MAGIC: +15 SV POISON: +5
Attack: +15
WT: 0.5 Size: SMALL
Class: PAL RNG SHD BRD BST
Race: ALL
Slot 1, Type 7 (General: Group)

Item Type:Armor
Stackable:No
Lucy Entry By:rale
Item Updated By:SwiftyMUSE
Source:Live
IC Last Updated:2021-07-27 16:05:17
Page Updated:Wed Apr 26th, 2017

Expansion: Legacy of Ykesha Legacy of Ykesha


Rarity: Common
Level to Attain: 60

[Quests | Comments ]

This item is the result of a quest.
Expansion List - Premium only.
Quest Name
Marsinger Hybrid No. 3

Quests

This item is used in quests.
Expansion List - Premium only.

Greater Faydark
Quest Name
Marsinger No. 4


Zone(s) Found In:


Zone Name
Greater Faydark
Screenshot

Uploaded November 27th, 2008
Send a correction
Post Comment
RE: Bow vs Gem
# Oct 25 2004 at 5:03 PM Rating: Decent
well i like it and i think that a new slot would be great but how bout a slot like secondary or charm
Vengeance Stacking
# May 07 2004 at 9:28 AM Rating: Decent
curious, can Vengeance items stack with each other?
RE: Vengeance Stacking
# Jul 23 2004 at 3:12 PM Rating: Good
*
85 posts
Yes. "Vengeance" has always stacked, but a while ago they removed that effect name and just put Attack: +5 or whatever (Vengeance I is +5, II is +10, and so on). There is an Attack+/Vengeance cap though I believe, which I think is Attack+100 (or "Vengeance XX").
RE: Vengeance Stacking
# Nov 20 2004 at 4:20 AM Rating: Decent
36 posts
The worn attack cap is 250. This means any items from gear or tribute with +ATK will cap out at 250. Tribute is considered as a worn effect.

Currently there is no cap on ATK from spells or songs. So you can have 250 worn ATK, and haste of salik & scarecrow illusion from chanters, ranger's 2 ATK buff lines, shaman ferine avatar, beastlords Ferocity, and also bard songs. Plus whatever else will stack with those.

Additionally, the proc effects from Prismatic and Primal weapons (they proc Avatar) count towards "worn" atk cap. Because it's coming from an item i guess, that's just how they made it work.

But the buff spell cast from shamans (Avatar & Ferine Avatar) do NOT count towards the worn cap.
#REDACTED, Posted: Apr 21 2004 at 8:48 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) OMG a friggin ranger complaining about a ranged slot item. go back to school little boy. geesh. Rangers only have the best ranged slot items available to them pre-elemental (not to mention the best sustained dps of all classes). You have most certainly made my morning. I love dumbasses like yourself. Thank you.
RE: gotta be kiddin me
# Jun 21 2004 at 3:36 PM Rating: Decent
what are you talking about? there's only a couple of bows that are ranger only that have nicer stats than this. last i checked the droppable elemental bows can be equipped by pallies and sks... and since when do rangers have the highest DPS of any class pre-elemental? Only if they are using an elemental weapon (i.e. stonewood, featherwood) and how can you compare pre-elemental dps to a ranger using an elemental bow? /boggle
#REDACTED, Posted: Apr 06 2004 at 8:16 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Ranger's and any class that can use the uber bows in EQ are being unfairly penalized -- modify this quest so that the items will fit in a charm slot -- after all is that not what they are -- if you agree please send a /feedback requesting this -- if you do not thanks for at least reading my humb le opinion --please no flaming :)
RE: Feedback Campaign
# Apr 20 2004 at 11:20 AM Rating: Default
Personally I think a Ranger should be the last one complaining. The bows which you can easily attain have better stats on them than these stones.
Bow vs gem
# Jan 16 2004 at 11:26 AM Rating: Default
maybe bad for a ranger but i like it for a bard
RE: Bow vs Gem
# Jul 07 2003 at 6:11 AM Rating: Default
They can't just take RNG off the item..these quests are made for each class types, so each get one item they can use..but really..range item with V3 for a range..thats not a bow? :\ wtf Verant
Bow vs Gem
# May 30 2003 at 4:32 PM Rating: Default
Very nice item, however seems kinda fruitless to give a high level ranger a range slot item that isn't a bow...
RE: Bow vs Gem
# Jun 02 2003 at 5:36 AM Rating: Default
/agree... Should be wearable in neck or face..
RE: Bow vs Gem
# Jun 02 2003 at 10:24 AM Rating: Decent
Better yet, just take ranger off of it. This is a pretty decent range slot item for the other classes listed. Would be a sub-par face or neck item for the level of difficulty.
RE: Bow vs Gem
# Dec 26 2003 at 11:07 PM Rating: Default
Rather than removing RNG from it and effectively ******** one class out of that series of quests while allowing all other classes access, it would make more sense (to me at least) to add other places that item can go into such as neck/face/ear
RE: Bow vs Gem
# Jun 02 2003 at 5:35 AM Rating: Default
/agree... Should be wearable in neck or face..
Post Comment

Free account required to post

You must log in or create an account to post messages.