Item GlossaryEverQuest icon

Phantasmal Tome  
 

LORE ITEM NO TRADE
WT: 2.0 Weight Reduction: 0%
Capacity: 10 Size Capacity: LARGE
Item Type:Container
Stackable:No
Merchant Value:50 pp 0 gp 0 sp 0 cp
Lucy Entry By:Bolly
Item Updated By:Gidono
Source:Live
IC Last Updated:2020-06-27 15:42:05
Page Updated:Sun Jul 12th, 2020
Classic Item


Rarity: Common
Level to Attain: 36

[Merchants | Comments ]

This item is the result of a quest.

Merchants:

Vendor listing - Premium only


Zone(s) Found In:
Used to research high level spells.
Screenshot

Uploaded November 27th, 2008
Send a correction
Post Comment
No Combine Button?
# Jan 15 2011 at 4:28 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
19 posts
Anyone else having a problem with this item no longer having a combine button?
No Combine Button?
# Jan 29 2011 at 8:56 PM Rating: Decent
19 posts
I am having the same problem and with Mages's containers too
#REDACTED, Posted: Feb 19 2004 at 6:28 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Punctuation is gay !!!
new tome
# Oct 03 2003 at 6:33 AM Rating: Decent
will do old spells also...
Replacemet
# Aug 25 2003 at 5:27 PM Rating: Decent
Just wondering if this tome will combine the old researched spells as well.... I really want to dump that old 4 slot tome of endless enchantments
about the tome
# Aug 03 2003 at 10:23 PM Rating: Default
if you are a 100 in Research just buy a Geerlok Automated Quill and then say i am a chanter and researcher Alvarik will give you the tome, you dont need to be over a 100 if you have the Quill in hand when you ask for it. my 35 chanter did it at 100 with the Quill. not sure if 99 will work didnt try that. and you dont have to do all the research work to get it to 200. every time you ding a lvl go to any enchanter trainer and put lvl points into it. sorry the post i did wasn't clear when i did it i was half a sleep.



Toptek

druid of 63
cleric of 63
chanter of 52
warr of 51





















Edited, Thu Nov 6 06:36:16 2003
RE: about the tome
# Sep 14 2003 at 5:59 AM Rating: Default
Jesus Christ dude! How about some punctuation? I'm just glad your post wasn't any longer. It was pretty useless to me actually....
#REDACTED, Posted: Oct 22 2003 at 6:35 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I kinda agree, very use full information, but very hard to understand your post, please use some coma's or something.
Post Comment

Free account required to post

You must log in or create an account to post messages.