I had a dream..Follow

I have this odd vision of a charity. It is called 'Cheaper than glock'. It is dedicated to helping young poor kids getting their hands on books and lappies.. What do you think?

I do not understand the question. Have you not been a kid? Do you know how hard was it to get a decent lappy when I was a kid? The answer is very.

I also had to go school uphill, both ways.

Edited, Jul 16th 2016 6:38pm by angrymnk

Pfft.. as if.. I was in a generation of students that was getting mildly intoxicated while the history teacher was getting chemistry teacher pregnant. Simpler times.

I had a dream about ending starvation, genocide, and poverty, but I can see how the rest of you would be focused on others things.

I had a dream where I nailed Hollywood starlets on top of a pile of robots I destroyed with my laser bazooka, but I bet your "ended starvation" dream was nice, too.

Jophiel, I should tell you earnestly and explicitly before the forum goes kaput that I've both appreciated and learned from your argument style (often with gbaji). Your points are typically well supported where need be, but not so unnecessarily thorough that you'd be be drained of ability to address the very next topic, which is a good balance of efficacy and efficiency. I also admire your dedication to representing your perspective. You're almost always willing to make the case, and approach the opposition genuinely, even knowing the historical direction the conversations tend to go. It's almost always a fresh start. It's difficult for me to say which points specifically and to what extent, but I'm pretty sure you have heelped shaped my views on many aspects the general liberal-conservative split.

I should also tell you earnestly and explicitly that regardless of how long the page takes to load or whatever error message you are told, the post pretty much always goes through with a single press of the "post" button.

Edited, Jul 17th 2016 2:27am by Allegory

I have also enjoyed arguing with, and arguing with you, Jophiel.

Sleep is for the weak.

Hey, those are indeterminate dual-state phrases, language rules suggest that they should be taken as opposite phrases when used in conjunction!

At least it's not mandarin fuckery where you are supposed to accept one meaning and talk as if that is the only one while the other meaning is the true and understood meaning.

Out here, we just lie to ourselves, and complain when other people do the same. You might wonder if that causes domestic disharmony, but we have guns to keep the peace.