Ugly wrote:
People have tried that with you, and then they get "see post #127" as a response.
Sir X wrote:
People may not realize they haven't understood it though. They may have simply understood something slightly different, or assumed that you had just made a weak argument. It goes both ways on your side as well. In the same way that you don't always write in a way that considers thought processes not specific to yourself, you also sometimes can read things as if they're written in your context. I can't really speak to this directly as I can't see inside your head, but it does seem this way.
you can certainly say, well it's others responsibility, not yours, but the hallmark of a good communicator is that they don't need to say that. finding a way to communicate effectively, especially without a common framework is hard.
you can certainly say, well it's others responsibility, not yours, but the hallmark of a good communicator is that they don't need to say that. finding a way to communicate effectively, especially without a common framework is hard.
None of that matters when they admit to not actually reading my posts. That's the point. They don't read the posts, but continue to argue. Then when proven wrong, they default to "I didn't read anything because I never understand what you write".
.