Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Hey Smash, what's wrong with Coakley?Follow

#1 Sep 30 2014 at 10:19 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
She gonna blow her election? 'Cause it looks as though she is going to blow her election.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#2 Sep 30 2014 at 11:39 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Nasal drip...
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#3 Sep 30 2014 at 12:50 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
She's probably going to blow her election. She's a terrible candidate. It's hard to overstate how much influence the state party has on primary elections here in the Worker's Paradise. They want a woman, she's the woman with the most name recognition. There isn't really a good alternative without a Y chromosome. It'd be a step backwards for Warren and not something I think she's particularly interested in regardless.

Nexa can testify that I've been saying "Shes going to blow the election" for about 4 months now at every mention of her name. The woman lost to Scott **** ing Brown. In Massachusetts. I have no idea if she'd be a good Governor or not. Baker, the guy who will probably be the next Governor, is an empty suit, but you really have to be almost unrecognizable as a GOP member to win here, so he's pro gay marriage, pro abortion, yadda. He'll probably try and fail to cut taxes since the legislature is a Dem supermajority in both houses.

She might pull it out. I'll vote for her.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#4 Sep 30 2014 at 1:17 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Maybe you guys should stop running her. I'm just spit-ballin' here.

Still pretty confident that Rauner will be governor here although, as over there, it'll still be a Democratic supermajority in the state legislature so the only pledge he'll actually be able to make good on will be letting a previous state income tax hike lapse. If he thinks he's going to start a big school choice program or "right to work" zones in the state, he's crazypants.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#5 Sep 30 2014 at 6:51 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Kao, is that censoring the word gay? I find that offensive. That's only a slur if one makes it a slur and it's a defacto slur by being censored. I guess I'll find out in a second when I post this. I suppose it's possible that Smash called it something else, because really, he's kind of a douche. I can't wait to see if douche is censored.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#6 Sep 30 2014 at 6:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
So it's not gay...man, I don't even want to know what he said there.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#7 Sep 30 2014 at 6:59 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
No, it was "gay". The filter is shitty and not only filters all sorts of nonsense, it doesn't even do it well.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#8 Sep 30 2014 at 7:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Jophiel wrote:
No, it was "gay". The filter is shitty and not only filters all sorts of nonsense, it doesn't even do it well.


Oh good. It's a variable offensive word filter...maybe it rates words on their offensiveness on a daily basis through some sort of matrix. Or maybe it's just one cranky dude with nothing to do.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#9 Sep 30 2014 at 7:22 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
It's worse than that. It apparently doesn't understand how to separate words from punctuation. So in the attempt to not filter Gaylord, it will also not filter a question like: Is he gay? Of course an offensive thing like the phrase gay marriage will be filtered. This would all be well and good and consistent except that it also seems to only filter every other offensive word that appears in a row. So gay gay gay gay (that's four gays in a row), does some interesting things.

I suppose you can always just escape the word like say \gay \gay \gay \gay. It's kinda silly.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#10 Sep 30 2014 at 10:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
It only filters offensive things. Objective statements of fact are not filtered, but derogatory or slanderous statements are. Gbaji is gay for pay. The filter is pretty gay. Joe's last name is Gaylord. The Google filter is run by pedophiles. The Gay killed Jesus.

See?
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#11 Oct 01 2014 at 4:43 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Wait! Now it is filtering correctly (um... for certain definitions of correctly)? My previous post makes even less sense than usual now. Smiley: bah
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#12 Oct 01 2014 at 5:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
gbaji wrote:
Wait! Now it is filtering correctly (um... for certain definitions of correctly)? My previous post makes even less sense than usual now. Smiley: bah


It's ok, I saw it before it "refiltered". I'll vouch for you. ONCE! ONE ******* TIME!

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#13 Oct 02 2014 at 5:42 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
gbaji wrote:
Wait! Now it is filtering correctly (um... for certain definitions of correctly)? My previous post makes even less sense than usual now. Smiley: bah

Now it looks like a transcript of a Quentin Tarantino movie.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 357 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (357)