Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Terrible things people call their childrenFollow

#77 Jun 12 2014 at 2:08 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
Really? Are you that dense that you're still missing his point?

I think it's pretty clear Gbaji isn't using "end out" by mistake, nor is smash implying he is.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#78 Jun 12 2014 at 2:10 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Ya'all need to spend some time in Maine if you want to hear some crazy-*** word usage.

Just sayin'
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#79 Jun 12 2014 at 2:13 PM Rating: Decent
*
229 posts
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I think it's pretty clear Gbaji isn't using "end out" by mistake, nor is smash implying he is.

Read what I wrote. Smasharoo said it was incorrect. A mistake. Not by. It's obvious Gbagi's using it out of habit.

You're both missing the point.

Edited, Jun 12th 2014 4:15pm by Demoncard
#80 Jun 12 2014 at 2:14 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
Elinda wrote:
Ya'all need to spend some time in Maine if you want to hear some crazy ***-word usage.

Just sayin'

***-words?
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#81 Jun 12 2014 at 2:14 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
I've made it clear that you thought


You've made it clear that someone else came to a particular conclusion? That's nice of you.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#82 Jun 12 2014 at 2:14 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
Demoncard wrote:
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I think it's pretty clear Gbaji isn't using "end out" by mistake, nor is smash implying he is.

Read what I said. Smasharoo said it was incorrect. A mistake. Not by. It's obvious Gbagi's using it out of habit.

Doing something on purpose isn't a mistake. Smiley: oyvey
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#83 Jun 12 2014 at 2:16 PM Rating: Decent
*
229 posts
Sir Xsarus wrote:
Demoncard wrote:
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I think it's pretty clear Gbaji isn't using "end out" by mistake, nor is smash implying he is.

Read what I said. Smasharoo said it was incorrect. A mistake. Not by. It's obvious Gbagi's using it out of habit.

Doing something on purpose isn't a mistake. Smiley: oyvey

Smasharoo said it was incorrect and wasn't standard english, which means it's wrong. Also a form of mistake.
#84 Jun 12 2014 at 2:17 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
It's nice that you don't actually understand what words mean. I appreciate you going to such great lengths to make it clear to everyone.

Do you now understand smashes point, because earlier you didn't seem to.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#85 Jun 12 2014 at 2:18 PM Rating: Decent
*
229 posts
Sir Xsarus wrote:
Do you now understand smashes point, because earlier you didn't seem to.

I understand that my original point's been buried by a complete misinterpretation of my argument, and that I'm wasting my time talking to you two.

Nothing I wrote in reply to you wasn't already in those earlier posts. You two chose to misinterpret them, interpreted them simplistically, or didn't understand the concepts that underpinned my argument.

Edited, Jun 12th 2014 4:22pm by Demoncard
#86 Jun 12 2014 at 2:23 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
You were responding to smash saying he wasn't being fair, because other people had made mistakes as well. He replied that he was being fair because a mistake is different then choosing to do something incorrectly. You then became unable to understand words for a while. Do you understand why someone who chooses to be wrong is different than someone who makes a typo or types in a grammatically incorrect sentence by mistake?
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#87 Jun 12 2014 at 2:26 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Demoncard wrote:
I'm wasting my time talking to you two.
I thought that was the whole point of this place? Smiley: confused
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#88 Jun 12 2014 at 2:26 PM Rating: Decent
*
229 posts
Sir Xsarus wrote:
You were responding to smash saying he wasn't being fair, because other people had made mistakes as well. He replied that he was being fair because a mistake is different then choosing to do something incorrectly. You then became unable to understand words for a while. Do you understand why someone who chooses to be wrong is different than someone who makes a typo or types in a grammatically incorrect sentence by mistake?

If I had said "I think that's unfair. If you're of the prescriptive disposition and you think his use of non-standard english is laughable, you ought to have picked up on the non standard english of the other users in the thread first, given that some of the instances are much worse.", he would have still gotten hung up on a single word and avoided the actual argument, much like you're both still doing.

Edited, Jun 12th 2014 4:27pm by Demoncard
#89 Jun 12 2014 at 2:26 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
I'm hoping if I spend enough time here my reports will write themselves.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#90 Jun 12 2014 at 2:29 PM Rating: Decent
*
229 posts
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I'm hoping if I spend enough time here my reports will write themselves.

You ought to get on with them then.

More fool me for overestimating certain Asylumites' grasp of the English language.
#91 Jun 12 2014 at 2:51 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
Smiley: lol
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#92 Jun 12 2014 at 3:06 PM Rating: Default
*
229 posts
You don't seem to understand the difference between a mistake, something that's wrong, an error, and wilfully doing something wrong, and both you and Smasharoo oversimplified my argument to something along the lines of "the asylumites were being unfair because a mistake isn't different then choosing to do something incorrectly", rather than Gbagi's usage of the verb phrase "end out" being fine because they understood what he meant when he wrote it.


I'll simplify it for you further. For instance,
Sir Xsarus wrote:
Negotiation has it's place

...that's a mistake, but I still know what you mean. You might have over-applied the rule for possessive apostrophes, or you might've made a typo. On the internet, that's acceptable english, because it doesn't significantly hinder understanding. It wouldn't be acceptable on a CV, what you'd call a "resume". Looking down non-standard elements on the internet is backward, given the nature of electronic means of communication.

Edited, Jun 12th 2014 5:08pm by Demoncard
#93 Jun 12 2014 at 3:12 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
GRAMMER ****! Smiley: mad
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#94 Jun 12 2014 at 3:15 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
GRAMMER ****! Smiley: mad
I like how this is a syntax argument being made by someone going out of their way to write in a completely unnatural sounding way.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#95 Jun 12 2014 at 3:50 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
Demoncard wrote:
You don't seem to understand the difference between a mistake, something that's wrong, an error, and wilfully doing something wrong, and both you and Smasharoo oversimplified my argument to something along the lines of "the asylumites were being unfair because a mistake isn't different then choosing to do something incorrectly", rather than Gbagi's usage of the verb phrase "end out" being fine because they understood what he meant when he wrote it.


I'll simplify it for you further. For instance,
Sir Xsarus wrote:
Negotiation has it's place

...that's a mistake, but I still know what you mean. You might have over-applied the rule for possessive apostrophes, or you might've made a typo. On the internet, that's acceptable english, because it doesn't significantly hinder understanding. It wouldn't be acceptable on a CV, what you'd call a "resume". Looking down non-standard elements on the internet is backward, given the nature of electronic means of communication.

Edited, Jun 12th 2014 5:08pm by Demoncard

It's a mistake because I didn't type it wrong on purpose, it was a typo. If I choose to type it that way, consistently across multiple posts and threads, then it is no longer a mistake. It is in both cases incorrect. Whether something is a mistake or incorrect is not influenced by the medium. You may choose to use more formal grammar in a more formal environment, or to be more careful around the grammar you use, but that doesn't make it more or less correct. Mistake implies it is not intentional.

No one is confused by what Gbaji means by end out.

Edited, Jun 12th 2014 4:54pm by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#96 Jun 12 2014 at 3:53 PM Rating: Excellent
If you're wondering, Demoncard, everyone thinks you're a ******.
#97 Jun 12 2014 at 3:55 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
"End up" isn't a literal phrase, so I don't think you can really call one way more correct when they both come to the same meaning.

What does it matter?

Or more correctly, who cares?





____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#98 Jun 12 2014 at 4:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Well for what it's worth this is more interesting than work right now. But I suppose doing billings isn't hard to top...
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#99 Jun 12 2014 at 4:09 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
"End up" is colloquial, but it is in common usage. "End out" has a specific meaning in industrial sewing, and is not commonly used colloquially.

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#100 Jun 12 2014 at 4:12 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
"End up" isn't a literal phrase, so I don't think you can really call one way more correct when they both come to the same meaning.

What does it matter?

Or more correctly, who cares?


It doesn't really matter, obviously. It doesn't matter if people use "literally" to mean "figuratively", or "affect" instead of "effect"; or say "for all intensive purposes", or "cut and dry" or whatever. I understand what they mean. It also doesn't matter if someone shows up to a job interview in shorts and flip flops. If you want to be taken seriously, however, you might dress more formally. If you want me to take your writing more seriously, use more formal language.

I realize the guy can't write. He's operating at a 5th grade reading level, who would really expect his extemporaneous thoughts to be well written? The least he could do, though, is make a simple correction when asked repeatedly. That's the point. Not the actual error. The fact that he refuses to correct it...because....spite? I guess? I intentionally don't use quotes. It's a choice. People sometimes comment on it. I'll just clarify that it's a choice. If Gbaji wants to clarify why he's created a brand new phrase in English to replace one that's worked for hundreds of years (probably, I have no idea of the etymology of "end up"), then I won't care. Until then, it seems a needless and churlish thing for him to do.



Edited, Jun 12th 2014 6:12pm by Smasharoo
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#101 Jun 12 2014 at 5:01 PM Rating: Good
***
2,188 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
GRAMMER ****! Smiley: mad

Godwin's Law? Does this mean Joph is wrong and this thread is dead?

____________________________
"the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country."
Hermann Goering, April 1946.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 396 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (396)