Female Feticide :: EverQuest

Quote Reply

#102 Jan 28 2012 at 1:03 AM Rating: Good

Belkira

View User Forum

Cervixhouse-Five

30,306 posts

Eske Esquire wrote:

Aripyanfar wrote:

But I'll try a flyby pass:

Sometimes actions in themselves are not wrong. But they can have negative consequences further down the line, especially en masse. The latter mass effect is so negative in effect on everyone, that it becomes necessary to regulate the original behaviour.

Aripyanfar wrote:

Except maybe two massy sets of balls riding high and tight, sweaty from exertion, pulsating together rhythmically?

Sensing a trend.

Me, too.

I wish I could play Mass Effect right now...

____________________________

Kurt Vonnegut (1922-2007) wrote:

I am eternally grateful.. for my knack of finding in great books, some of them very funny books, reason enough to feel honored to be alive, no matter what else might be going on.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#103 Jan 28 2012 at 5:11 AM Rating: Good

Aripyanfar

Everyone's Oiran

15,491 posts

I can't help it. Smiley: frown

I did a physics at school. Weight is a force and a vector. It has direction. It has acceleration.

Hmm, actually, weight does conceptually mesh with well with sex.

____________________________

<3

I don't think that reverance or respect for the dead needs the dead to be hidden from sight completely. It is the attitude that you bring, as a witness to a dead body, that matters, not the display and witnessing of a dead body, per se.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#104 Jan 29 2012 at 7:06 AM Rating: Default

Almalieque

7,940 posts

Elinda wrote:

Almalieque wrote:

How is that not hypocritical to say it's ok for a woman to have her 4th abortion because she doesn't use protection, but wrong for a woman to have her first abortion because she wants a male?

Overwhelmingly the responses in this thread (Sweetums included) claim that it's not wrong for a woman to have an abortion (regardless of reason). Independent of that argument, most also negatively view a societal believe that woman are of less worth than men.

Edited, Jan 27th 2012 6:30pm by Elinda

I don't disagree. That's what I said. However, if you have a problem against abortions for that reason, then you're no different than everyone else having problems with abortions for certain reasons.

You may see it as "women being less worth than men", but the people having the abortion may see it as "passing on the family name" or "having a daughter". My friends are mostly women and I'll do anything for a woman before I do for a man, however, I still would rather have a son than a daughter. Likewise, most of my female friends want daughters than sons. I have no intentions of ever having an abortion, but if we decide to have an abortion to have a girl or to have a boy, you can't deduce our feelings on sexes. If a couple only wants one child and wants it to be a daughter, why should you care what they do if you support abortions?

As I said, the inequality of sexes is a separate issue from abortion and they shouldn't be placed together.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#105 Jan 29 2012 at 7:44 AM Rating: Default

Almalieque

7,940 posts

Aripyanfar wrote:

But I'll try a flyby pass:

Sometimes actions in themselves are not wrong. But they can have negative consequences further down the line, especially en masse. The latter mass effect is so negative in effect on everyone, that it becomes necessary to regulate the original behaviour.

Yes, but to what extinct? Are you willing to ban abortion to prevent this? How will you differentiate "I don't want a girl/boy" from " I just don't want a child"?

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#106 Jan 29 2012 at 9:28 AM Rating: Excellent

Samira

View User Forum

Will swallow your soul

27,499 posts

You need a new flash card for "extinct", I believe.

____________________________

In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply