Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Reply To Thread

Kicked out of theater for textingFollow

#1 Jun 07 2011 at 4:51 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
7,880 posts
I hate making threads on Yahoo news topics, as most people probably already read them, but this is interesting to me.

So, the lady gets the boot for texting in a theater. I understand talking and making loud noises, but people are complaining that the light from the phone "removes you from the movie".. Really? I just want to get a second opinion/explanation on how texting in a theater distracts you from a movie?


....According to Tim League, the Drafthouse's founder, the woman in question was warned twice about texting during a screening, and then, in accordance with company policy, was escorted out without a refund. ....


Edited, Jun 8th 2011 12:40pm by Almalieque
#2 Jun 07 2011 at 4:56 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
37,098 posts
A light coming from the corner of my field of vision is annoying as all fuck.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
WINSDAY COMIC REVIEW
Current Time Killer


#3 Jun 07 2011 at 4:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Unforkgettable
*****
11,869 posts
Because when you're sitting behind them, and their phone light is flashing on and off incessantly over the course of the movie, it's @#%^ing annoying.
____________________________
Banh
#4 Jun 07 2011 at 4:58 PM Rating: Decent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
34,007 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
A light coming from the corner of my field of vision is annoying as all fuck.
If the light distracts you from the movie, it probably wasn't all that great of a movie in the first place.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.
Need a hotel at a great rate? More hotels being added weekly.

An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#5 Jun 07 2011 at 5:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
34,007 posts
Spoonless the Silent wrote:
Because when you're sitting behind them, and their phone light is flashing on and off incessantly over the course of the movie, it's @#%^ing annoying.
Does that mean we can get the moron who repeats everything said in the movie kicked out? If we can get everyone removed who's annoying, I'm suddenly in support of removing her from the theatre.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.
Need a hotel at a great rate? More hotels being added weekly.

An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#6 Jun 07 2011 at 5:00 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
7,880 posts
Hmmp.. Maybe it's because I can sleep in light is the reason why light doesn't bother me.. Crying/bad kids, people smacking on their food and people talking are waaaay more distracting to me than someone texting on a phone.
#7 Jun 07 2011 at 5:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Scholar
****
9,846 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
A light coming from the corner of my field of vision is annoying as all fuck.


This. Some phones these days are practically flashlights.
____________________________
Hyrist wrote:
Ok, now we're going to get slash fiction of Wint x Kachi somehere... rule 34 and all...

Never confuse your inference as the listener for an implication of the speaker.

Good games are subjective like good food is subjective. You're not going to seriously tell me that there's not a psychological basis for why pizza is great and lutefisk is revolting. The thing about subjectivity is that, as subjects go, humans actually have a great deal in common.
#8 Jun 07 2011 at 5:03 PM Rating: Default
lolgaxe wrote:
A light coming from the corner of my field of vision is annoying as all fuck.


This. There's also the noise.

The Alamo Drafthouse also has a reputation as a snob-run, hipster favored sort of place. Given that and the warnings, I don't see anything wrong with what they did. The girl had plenty of reason to expect it.
____________________________
BANNED SO OTHER ACCOUNT CAN BE USED, BUT THAT ALL YOU GET
#9 Jun 07 2011 at 5:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
37,098 posts
I see a brief flash of light in the dark and I take notice of it. Maybe its PTSD, I don't know. I just know it annoys me.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
WINSDAY COMIC REVIEW
Current Time Killer


#10 Jun 07 2011 at 5:12 PM Rating: Good
Unforkgettable
*****
11,869 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Spoonless the Silent wrote:
Because when you're sitting behind them, and their phone light is flashing on and off incessantly over the course of the movie, it's @#%^ing annoying.
Does that mean we can get the moron who repeats everything said in the movie kicked out? If we can get everyone removed who's annoying, I'm suddenly in support of removing her from the theatre.
The theater in question kicks people for talking as well.
____________________________
Banh
#11 Jun 07 2011 at 5:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Everyone's Oiran
Avatar
*****
15,485 posts
Everywhere else, the lights from phones don't bother me. But movie theatres are so dark, that phones ARE like flashlights in comparison. They send up this big beam that's like 20-30 feet wide, it just spreads so much. And they make the auditorium visible. There you were with nothing but the movie screen visible, enclosed in darkness, and then this vapourous light suddenly makes a huge bunch of heads and seats visible, and washes out the movie screen behind it.

It's fucking annoying.
____________________________
<3

I don't think that reverance or respect for the dead needs the dead to be hidden from sight completely. It is the attitude that you bring, as a witness to a dead body, that matters, not the display and witnessing of a dead body, per se.
#12 Jun 07 2011 at 5:17 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I find it distracting.

Anyway, their theater, their rules. If you need to text that bad, you must not be into the movie that much anyway so you might as well leave (or be escorted out) rather than annoy other people. I'm sure everyone will weep when you refuse to take your phone and see a movie at that theater again.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Senator Toomey (R-PA) wrote:
In the end it didn't pass because we're so politicized. There were some on my side who did not want to be seen helping the president do something he wanted to get done, just because the president wanted to do it
#13 Jun 07 2011 at 5:32 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
7,880 posts
I figured that everyone would disagree.

Well, I don't normally go see movies anyway, so maybe I haven't experienced that moment yet. It probably has to deal with the fact that I purposely go when there isn't anyone there, so I wont get distracted by these things.

Heh. I plan on going this week, so I'll see if my opinion will remain the same.

Edited, Jun 8th 2011 1:58am by Almalieque
#14 Jun 07 2011 at 5:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Encyclopedia
******
29,063 posts
It depends on the theater. As someone said: "Their theater, their rules". In a dark theater, a phone with a large bright display is incredibly distracting. I'd expect anyone doing something distracting from the viewing experience of the other patrons to be warned and then removed if they continue. Not all theaters do this, but that doesn't make it ok. It's rude as hell at the very least. And I also have to wonder why anyone would do this. Why are you texting while watching a film in the first place?

Edited, Jun 7th 2011 4:58pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#15 Jun 07 2011 at 6:00 PM Rating: Decent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
34,007 posts
Personally, I think you all just lack the ability to focus.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.
Need a hotel at a great rate? More hotels being added weekly.

An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#16 Jun 07 2011 at 6:01 PM Rating: Default
Avatar
****
7,880 posts
gbaji wrote:
It depends on the theater. As someone said: "Their theater, their rules". In a dark theater, a phone with a large bright display is incredibly distracting. I'd expect anyone doing something distracting from the viewing experience of the other patrons to be warned and then removed if they continue. Not all theaters do this, but that doesn't make it ok. It's rude as hell at the very least. And I also have to wonder why anyone would do this. Why are you texting while watching a film in the first place?

Edited, Jun 7th 2011 4:58pm by gbaji


I have no problem with someone getting kicked out for violating a simple rule, especially if you've been warned. I just don't see the level of annoyance, but once again, I'll see this week if my opinion will remain the same.

As for the reason to text in the theater, I assume they are responding to a text and not necessarily starting a conversation.
#17 Jun 07 2011 at 6:15 PM Rating: Excellent
Encyclopedia
******
29,063 posts
Almalieque wrote:
As for the reason to text in the theater, I assume they are responding to a text and not necessarily starting a conversation.


Why are they responding to a text? What could possibly be so important that you couldn't wait until after the film was over to respond? When I'm watching a film in a theater, my phone goes on vibrate. Unless I'm on call, if I get a call or text, I hit the end button without looking at it. Because I'm going to wait until the film is over to respond anyway, so I don't need to know who sent me a message or called anyway, right?

If I'm on call, I'll glance at the thing and if it's important I will walk out of the theater to deal with it. Because that's what polite responsible people do. And yes, I have on occasion missed parts of films because of this. But I'm not going to make everyone else in the theater suffer for my own convenience. That's just selfish as hell. And I'd never even consider doing this just to carry on some inane conversation with someone. If you're doing that, then why are you in the theater?


I just don't get that at all. The whole point of a text message is that it need not be in real time. I can view it and respond later at my leisure. If you want to talk to someone in real time, why not call them instead? Shocking thought, I know.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#18 Jun 07 2011 at 6:18 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Personally, I think you all just lack the ability to focus.

So does the texter. Only my lack of focus won't get me kicked out.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Senator Toomey (R-PA) wrote:
In the end it didn't pass because we're so politicized. There were some on my side who did not want to be seen helping the president do something he wanted to get done, just because the president wanted to do it
#19 Jun 07 2011 at 6:18 PM Rating: Excellent
Sage
****
4,032 posts
Every single movie I have ever seen in the past decade has some big advertisement (sometimes two or three) that ask you kindly and firmly to please turn off your cell phones. I don't see why someone would be shocked and upset if they were kicked out after being told several times by the theater to turn the f*cker off. If you can't turn your phone off for 2-3hrs, you have a problem. If you are annoying other theater goers, you are, so deal with it.
#20 Jun 07 2011 at 6:36 PM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
13,869 posts
Good riddance.
____________________________
Almalieque wrote:
I'm biased against statistics

#21 Jun 07 2011 at 7:03 PM Rating: Default
Avatar
****
7,880 posts
Gbaji wrote:
Why are they responding to a text? What could possibly be so important that you couldn't wait until after the film was over to respond? When I'm watching a film in a theater, my phone goes on vibrate. Unless I'm on call, if I get a call or text, I hit the end button without looking at it. Because I'm going to wait until the film is over to respond anyway, so I don't need to know who sent me a message or called anyway, right?

If I'm on call, I'll glance at the thing and if it's important I will walk out of the theater to deal with it. Because that's what polite responsible people do. And yes, I have on occasion missed parts of films because of this. But I'm not going to make everyone else in the theater suffer for my own convenience. That's just selfish as hell. And I'd never even consider doing this just to carry on some inane conversation with someone. If you're doing that, then why are you in the theater?


I just don't get that at all. The whole point of a text message is that it need not be in real time. I can view it and respond later at my leisure.


How about "I'm at the movies, I'll talk to you later"?

That's just me, I like to respond ASAP or I'll forget (if not in a conversation)and there's nothing I hate more than an email/text/message/etc. being ignored. I tend to sit in the very top row right beneath the projector, you know that box of light? So I doubt my 3.14 seconds of light in a 1.5+ hour movie really distracted anyone given my position in the theater. At the same time, I wouldn't violate that rule knowing that I would get kicked out.

Gbaji wrote:
If you want to talk to someone in real time, why not call them instead? Shocking thought, I know.


I don't know... maybe when you're in an environment where noise isn't permitted?

Besides, I prefer to text than talk depending on the topic. It's much more comfortable for me.

Guenny wrote:
Every single movie I have ever seen in the past decade has some big advertisement (sometimes two or three) that ask you kindly and firmly to please turn off your cell phones. I don't see why someone would be shocked and upset if they were kicked out after being told several times by the theater to turn the f*cker off. If you can't turn your phone off for 2-3hrs, you have a problem. If you are annoying other theater goers, you are, so deal with it.


That's what silent and vibrate are for. The only time I actually turn off my phone is when fly. You can't even get people to turn off their phones for the safety of their own lives, you think they will turn them off for a movie?
#22 Jun 07 2011 at 7:19 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
34,007 posts
Almalieque wrote:
That's what silent and vibrate are for. The only time I actually turn off my phone is when fly.
Same here. I used to turn it off in movies, but don't now that I have kids as I may get an emergency call while in the theatres. Mind you, I'd excuse myself before answering it, but the light would still flash on and annoy all of you people who lack any quality focusing skills. I'd never text but again, I don't see the issue with it anyway.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.
Need a hotel at a great rate? More hotels being added weekly.

An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#23 Jun 07 2011 at 7:22 PM Rating: Excellent
If you're sitting at the very back, sure it might not cause much of a fuss. Seeing as most of the people in the theater will not be in the very back however makes that sort of irrelevant. I can see it being annoying to have a bright cellphone suddenly exposed, but I can't say I've ever actually noticed anyone doing that, so I somehow doubt it's a big deal. I'll side with Ugly on this one and say you guys need to learn how to focus.

If someone is warned though, and keeps doing it they're an idiot.

Edited, Jun 7th 2011 8:23pm by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#24 Jun 07 2011 at 7:38 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
9,846 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
That's what silent and vibrate are for. The only time I actually turn off my phone is when fly.
Same here. I used to turn it off in movies, but don't now that I have kids as I may get an emergency call while in the theatres. Mind you, I'd excuse myself before answering it, but the light would still flash on and annoy all of you people who lack any quality focusing skills. I'd never text but again, I don't see the issue with it anyway.


There's a big difference between having your phone go off and excusing yourself versus carrying on with a conversation and keeping the thing out for an extended period. I should think that's perfectly obvious. Most people will grant you that courtesy in the former situation; most people expect more courtesy in return regarding the latter.
____________________________
Hyrist wrote:
Ok, now we're going to get slash fiction of Wint x Kachi somehere... rule 34 and all...

Never confuse your inference as the listener for an implication of the speaker.

Good games are subjective like good food is subjective. You're not going to seriously tell me that there's not a psychological basis for why pizza is great and lutefisk is revolting. The thing about subjectivity is that, as subjects go, humans actually have a great deal in common.
#25 Jun 07 2011 at 8:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Encyclopedia
******
29,063 posts
Almalieque wrote:
How about "I'm at the movies, I'll talk to you later"?


And if you don't reply? Won't they just assume "he must be busy and will talk to me later"? So the text is kinda unnecessary, isn't it?

Quote:
That's just me, I like to respond ASAP or I'll forget (if not in a conversation)and there's nothing I hate more than an email/text/message/etc. being ignored.


If you'll forget to respond, then it wasn't very important, right? If it's really important, whomever texted you will text you again, or call you, or do the usual things one does when they actually need to get in touch with someone as opposed to sending something completely inane.

Quote:
I tend to sit in the very top row right beneath the projector, you know that box of light? So I doubt my 3.14 seconds of light in a 1.5+ hour movie really distracted anyone given my position in the theater. At the same time, I wouldn't violate that rule knowing that I would get kicked out.


Weren't you the one who insisted that he could text and drive completely safely? Might have been someone else. If you have to argue that what you're doing isn't bothering anyone, when a whole thread full of people are telling you otherwise, you're probably bothering people. Do I mind if someone briefly checks an incoming message? No. But if you're constantly picking up your phone, reading it, and typing on it, then it will bother me. It'll bother me if I'm in the row next to you because I have this thing called peripheral vision that makes a bright light in a dark room very very noticeable. And It'll bother me if I'm in front of you because I can hear you fiddling with your damn phone.


It's about being courteous to those around you. You should refrain from doing anything which might bother someone, not make excuses and insist that what you're doing isn't. Just a suggestion.

Quote:
Gbaji wrote:
If you want to talk to someone in real time, why not call them instead? Shocking thought, I know.


I don't know... maybe when you're in an environment where noise isn't permitted?


We can hear you typing. And digging your phone out of your pocket. If you're in an environment where noise isn't permitted, don't think that texting is just peachy. It's not.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#26 Jun 07 2011 at 8:20 PM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,708 posts
Good, that sh*t is annoying. But does this really need a thread?
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
Stylish plugin for Firefox | ZAM/Allakhazam Widescreen/ad-free Stylish theme
#27 Jun 07 2011 at 8:22 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
******
37,098 posts
bsphil wrote:
But does this really need a thread?
Do most of the topics here?
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
WINSDAY COMIC REVIEW
Current Time Killer


#28 Jun 07 2011 at 8:29 PM Rating: Default
Avatar
****
7,880 posts
Gbaji wrote:
And if you don't reply? Won't they just assume "he must be busy and will talk to me later"? So the text is kinda unnecessary, isn't it?


That's not the way I roll. If you text me, unless I'm unable to text back, I will text back.

Gbaji wrote:
If you'll forget to respond, then it wasn't very important, right? If it's really important, whomever texted you will text you again, or call you, or do the usual things one does when they actually need to get in touch with someone as opposed to sending something completely inane.


Only if you're not differentiating between important and an emergency. Are you implying that people don't forget important stuff? Besides, how will the distracted person know the difference between you texting something irrelevant vs something important? The damage is the same. According to the girl (who I don't believe), she was just using her cell to find her seat, but was treated the same.

Gbaji wrote:
Weren't you the one who insisted that he could text and drive completely safely?


I don't recall posting about that, but I only text at stop lights, not when my car is in motion.

Gbaji wrote:
If you have to argue that what you're doing isn't bothering anyone, when a whole thread full of people are telling you otherwise, you're probably bothering people.


Except no one has ever said that I was bothering them, but the general concept. If my flash of light underneath a box of light at the very top row somehow annoys you, then you have a problem.

As I've been writing in this forum, I recall seeing a bright light from a cell phone and was shocked, but as I said, I don't go to the movies often to solidify my opinion. I went 3+ years without going to the theaters and only have gone twice since I came back to the states last August.

Gbaji wrote:
And It'll bother me if I'm in front of you because I can hear you fiddling with your damn phone.
.....

We can hear you typing. And digging your phone out of your pocket. If you're in an environment where noise isn't permitted, don't think that texting is just peachy. It's not.



Then that's a crappy phone, touch screens don't make noises when typing. You're not going to hear anyone getting their phones out of their pockets unless they have keys or something in there. If they're constantly texting, then they probably will have their phones out the whole time.

Gbaji wrote:
It's about being courteous to those around you. You should refrain from doing anything which might bother someone, not make excuses and insist that what you're doing isn't. Just a suggestion.


The point of me making this thread was to find out if that was indeed distracting because again, I don't go to the theaters that often, but it didn't seem like a distraction to me, but after jogging my memory, I can see the potential.


#29 Jun 07 2011 at 9:36 PM Rating: Excellent
lolgaxe wrote:
A light coming from the corner of my field of vision is annoying as all fuck.

Amen, brother.


ALSO: Yeah, I'm with gbaji on this one.


Take your phone out to the lobby if it's that damned important.

Edited, Jun 7th 2011 9:38pm by Bijou
____________________________
Kavekk wrote:
If I ever have a child, I'm going to show it this thread every time it misbehaves.

#30 Jun 07 2011 at 10:26 PM Rating: Excellent
The Duck Whisperer
*****
15,507 posts
This is why I love the Alamo Drafthouse. There's one that's only about a walk away from me :)

It's really not so hard to ignore your cell phone for less than two hours, is it? You're not a paramedic.


No annoying patrons and they serve alcohol and food. What's not to love?

Edited, Jun 7th 2011 11:31pm by Sweetums
____________________________
Iamadam the Prophet wrote:

You know that feeling you get when you have a little bit of hope, only to have it ripped away? Sweetums feeds on that.
#31 Jun 07 2011 at 10:58 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
*****
19,200 posts
I realized how annoying cellphones are in a theater when I called my dealer and he bitched me out because he was watching X2.

Turn off your damn cellphones, people.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#32 Jun 07 2011 at 11:12 PM Rating: Excellent
Almalieque wrote:
Gbaji wrote:
And if you don't reply? Won't they just assume "he must be busy and will talk to me later"? So the text is kinda unnecessary, isn't it?


That's not the way I roll. If you text me, unless I'm unable to text back, I will text back.


That makes sense, I think getting the last word in is a compulsion with you.
____________________________
Love,
PunkFloyd
#33 Jun 08 2011 at 1:37 AM Rating: Good
Supreme Lionator
*****
13,488 posts
As a wise man once said, lights can be fucking distracting.
____________________________
“Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.”
#34 Jun 08 2011 at 2:31 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
9,846 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
bsphil wrote:
But does this really need a thread?
Do most of the topics here?


Especially those started by the OP in question?
____________________________
Hyrist wrote:
Ok, now we're going to get slash fiction of Wint x Kachi somehere... rule 34 and all...

Never confuse your inference as the listener for an implication of the speaker.

Good games are subjective like good food is subjective. You're not going to seriously tell me that there's not a psychological basis for why pizza is great and lutefisk is revolting. The thing about subjectivity is that, as subjects go, humans actually have a great deal in common.
#35 Jun 08 2011 at 4:14 AM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
34,007 posts
gbaji wrote:
We can hear you typing. And digging your phone out of your pocket.
Seriously? Really? How fucking bad are the movies that you're going to? While I disagree with the light being a distraction, I can understand it, but the noise of someone digging into their pocket? Does the noise of people breathing bother you as well?
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.
Need a hotel at a great rate? More hotels being added weekly.

An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#36Almalieque, Posted: Jun 08 2011 at 4:36 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) He watches silent films. Absolutely no sound should be in the theater..
#37 Jun 08 2011 at 4:49 AM Rating: Good
***
2,069 posts
I have IDS, so I need to constantly be texting.
____________________________
http://www.marriageissogay.com/

Song of the day:
May 26, 2011 -- Transplants
#38 Jun 08 2011 at 6:23 AM Rating: Excellent
Annoying Ass
ZAM Administrator
Avatar
*****
11,820 posts
The premise aside, that theater is freaking awesome. The patron they kicked out called back and left a profanity-filled drunken voicemail. Result? They turned it into a PSA to displace before Rated R films. Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Volunteer News Writer for the ZAM Network.
WoW - Aureliano the Insane - level 90 Druid on Sen'Jin
Nanaoki - level 88 Mage on Sen'Jin
#39 Jun 08 2011 at 6:40 AM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,708 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:
The premise aside, that theater is freaking awesome. The patron they kicked out called back and left a profanity-filled drunken voicemail. Result? They turned it into a PSA to displace before Rated R films. Smiley: laugh
That's pretty awesome.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
Stylish plugin for Firefox | ZAM/Allakhazam Widescreen/ad-free Stylish theme
#40 Jun 08 2011 at 7:12 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
Avatar
*****
12,631 posts
Almalieque wrote:
I hate making threads on Yahoo news topics, as most people probably already read them, but this is interesting to me.

So, the lady gets the boot for texting in a theater. I understand talking and making loud noises, but people are complaining that the light from the phone "removes you from the movie".. Really? I just want to get a second opinion/explanation on how texting in a theater distracts you from a movie?


....According to Tim League, the Drafthouse's founder, the woman in question was warned twice about texting during a screening, and then, in accordance with company policy, was escorted out without a refund. ....


Edited, Jun 8th 2011 12:40pm by Almalieque
I'm guessing before the movie there is some cute little clip about turning your cell phone is off. The woman was warned - twice. It seems like she was being intentionally defiant. I'd toss her out in a heartbeat.





Edited, Jun 8th 2011 3:12pm by Elinda
____________________________
When I say "Red light" stop, when I say "Green light" go.

Ready?
#41 Jun 08 2011 at 8:48 AM Rating: Good
Cervixhouse-Five
******
30,301 posts
Yeah, that light is freaking annoying. It's distracting. It has nothing to do with focus.

Also: If I can't text back, I'll text back...? WTF?
____________________________
Kurt Vonnegut (1922-2007) wrote:
I am eternally grateful.. for my knack of finding in great books, some of them very funny books, reason enough to feel honored to be alive, no matter what else might be going on.
#42 Jun 08 2011 at 9:38 AM Rating: Decent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
34,007 posts
Belkira wrote:
It has nothing to do with focus.
I suppose, but why is it I can tune it out and "you" can't ignore it?
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.
Need a hotel at a great rate? More hotels being added weekly.

An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#43 Jun 08 2011 at 9:43 AM Rating: Excellent
Unforkgettable
*****
11,869 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Belkira wrote:
It has nothing to do with focus.
I suppose, but why is it I can tune it out and "you" can't ignore it?
I think you're hugely overestimating the level of annoyance most people feel towards it. For myself, I find it pretty @#%^ing annoying, but it's not something so bad that I'm going to talk to the person or to an usher to get them to stop. It doesn't impede my ability to watch the movie, but it detracts from the overall experience.
____________________________
Banh
#44 Jun 08 2011 at 9:47 AM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,001 posts
Ok seriously, who the hell ever gets an EMERGENCY text?? Really?? I've got an emergency and I'm going to fUcking TEXT someone??

Don't get me wrong, I'm a texter before I'll call someone. But if your friends and family are going to text you when your Uncle Bob has a heart attack, there's something wrong there.
#45 Jun 08 2011 at 9:47 AM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,001 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Belkira wrote:
It has nothing to do with focus.
I suppose, but why is it I can tune it out and "you" can't ignore it?


Stop trolling. You're more annoying than a cell phone.
#46 Jun 08 2011 at 9:50 AM Rating: Default
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
34,007 posts
Spoonless the Silent wrote:
I think you're hugely overestimating the level of annoyance most people feel towards it.
I'm not overestimating. If anything, they're overstating.

Spoonless the Silent wrote:
but it detracts from the overall experience.
Again, no reason why it should if you can tune it out/ignore it. Isn't that pretty much the definition of focusing?
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.
Need a hotel at a great rate? More hotels being added weekly.

An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#47 Jun 08 2011 at 9:52 AM Rating: Decent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
34,007 posts
Nadenu wrote:
Ok seriously, who the hell ever gets an EMERGENCY text?? Really?? I've got an emergency and I'm going to fUcking TEXT someone??
Was that directed at me? I don't answer texts in theatres. I don't even answer calls unless its from home while I'm out with the kids. I don't not answer for the benefit of any of you though, I do it because I'm at a movie and want to watch it, not fuck around with my phone.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.
Need a hotel at a great rate? More hotels being added weekly.

An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#48 Jun 08 2011 at 9:53 AM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,001 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Nadenu wrote:
Ok seriously, who the hell ever gets an EMERGENCY text?? Really?? I've got an emergency and I'm going to fUcking TEXT someone??
Was that directed at me? I don't answer texts in theatres. I don't even answer calls unless its from home while I'm out with the kids. I don't not answer for the benefit of any of you though, I do it because I'm at a movie and want to watch it, not fuck around with my phone.


No, it was directed at Alma. Way to think it's all about you, though.
#49 Jun 08 2011 at 9:55 AM Rating: Decent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
34,007 posts
Nadenu wrote:
Way to think it's all about you, though.
If it's not about me, it's barely worth reading.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.
Need a hotel at a great rate? More hotels being added weekly.

An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#50 Jun 08 2011 at 10:16 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
****
9,846 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Does the noise of people breathing bother you as well?


You've set yourself up for such an obvious mouthbreather joke that it wouldn't be sporting to take it.

Uglysasquatch wrote:
Belkira wrote:
It has nothing to do with focus.
I suppose, but why is it I can tune it out and "you" can't ignore it?


The average person can ignore much more and much worse, but that doesn't mean they'll be willing to. Rarely does someone completely remove themselves from the movie long enough to get an usher unless it has escalated. Usually someone ignores it for a while, then casts disapproving glances, then hushes, then optionally harsher words before someone actually gets up. And that's when you're trying to not make a ruckus. I've seen people just plain yell at dicks who continue to be discourteous even after being made aware that their behavior was disruptive.

Generally the way these things go is that the person who gets thrown out has this attitude of impunity and "Watchoo gonna do? Yeah, NOTHING." And likewise people are happy to get them thrown out because they're being gaping, dildo-stuffed assholes.

Edited, Jun 8th 2011 9:16am by Kachi
____________________________
Hyrist wrote:
Ok, now we're going to get slash fiction of Wint x Kachi somehere... rule 34 and all...

Never confuse your inference as the listener for an implication of the speaker.

Good games are subjective like good food is subjective. You're not going to seriously tell me that there's not a psychological basis for why pizza is great and lutefisk is revolting. The thing about subjectivity is that, as subjects go, humans actually have a great deal in common.
#51 Jun 08 2011 at 10:28 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
34,007 posts
Kachi wrote:
The average person can ignore much more and much worse, but that doesn't mean they'll be willing to.
So then they're petty? How's that better?
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.
Need a hotel at a great rate? More hotels being added weekly.

An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 70 All times are in CDT
BeanX, Bijou, Anonymous Guests (68)