Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

ML and autosplitFollow

#1 Mar 03 2004 at 5:20 AM Rating: Default
I a m starting LDoN soon on MR and afair I encountered two kinds of ways the ML would deal the final step while playing on FV (but I had only 11 LDoN - sessions so far there)

Sometimes I got some dozen plat with "you recieve xxp as your share". 'And sometimes the ML came back from the Vendor and "traded" everybody his share.

Now which method is "standard" in your opinion and why would one use different ones
#2 Mar 03 2004 at 5:53 AM Rating: Decent
*
136 posts
Standard method would be the ML shares with the group with /split p g s c. Personally I wouldnt be comfortable with relying on the math of others past deducting regent costs from the main split.

Usually when someone splits manually with group its because they don't know how to /split...or because a member of the group has gone LD and they don't want to make everyone wait around for their cut.

As far as autosplit goes, alot of people use it in regualar non-LDoN groups...but its an unfair cut favoring the looter and ******** most everyone else...and if you have a monk in the group it forces them to constantly destroy money to keep their weight below 16.

Edited, Wed Mar 3 05:58:28 2004 by plick
#3 Mar 03 2004 at 6:13 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
Autosplit is the devil. Nobody should ever use it. First it gives a disproportionately large share to the looter. Second it really pisses off Monks.

Standard is for one person to loot and split everything after vendoring.
#4 Mar 03 2004 at 6:57 AM Rating: Decent
So what is the technical difference now between /split p g s c and /autosplit (I didn't understand the part of favouring the looter I am afraid)?

wont the /split command take everything the ML has on money? (means he has to start the adventure with 0p0g0s0c)


Edited, Wed Mar 3 06:59:44 2004 by Leiany
#5 Mar 03 2004 at 7:19 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
Lets say the mob has 7 platinum pieces, and there are 6 people in the group, the person who loots gets 2pp, everyone else gets 1pp.

Lets say the mob has 3 platinum pieces, this time the person looting gets all 3pp, as the total doesn't not divide by 6.

The split command works like this:

/split 30 100 80 10

would split 30pp, 100gp, 80sp, 10cp, so the master looter notes how much money he starts with, and splits the difference after selling. Obviously you have to trust your master looter, however this is better than knowing for sure that the master looter is walking away with a lot more loot because of autosplit.
#6 Mar 03 2004 at 7:25 AM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
With the /split command, you specify the exact amount you want to split. So, if the adventure earned 120pp, and you've got 6 people, a /split 120 will give each player 20pp (I think I've got the syntax right. I rarely ML, so I always have to check the help each time...).

/autosplit on/off is a toggle. When it's on, everytime you loot, you will split the loot among everyone in the group. Both actually use the same system, but there's a huge difference in the end result (Let me explain).

In both cases, the split is done by simply taking the number of players in the group and dividing each coin among them. It does not make change. The remainder ends up left in the hands of the person doing the spliting (or the looter in the case of autosplit).

The difference should be obvious. If you loot 50 mobs each dropping 5pp, the looter (you) will get all 5pp of each split. There isn't enough to give everyone in the group a full platinum piece, so you get it all (5 divided by 6 is 0 with 5pp remainding. You get the remainder, right?).

After 50 mobs, you'll have 250pp and everyone else will have zero. That's if you just loot with /autosplit on.

If you have autosplit off and use a /split 250 at the end of the adventure, each person will get 41pp (and you'll get 45pp, but hey! You carried around all that loot, right?). That's not too bad. It's as "fair" as a split can be without going out and making change and taking tons of time doing it. No one's going to quibble on a few plat more or less over an hour of looting. They'll care alot about a few plat lost on every single loot.


So yeah. /autosplit is just evil. It's not fair. It's a pain in the butt. Monks hate it. If someone insists on using /autosplit, then insist on someone else being ML. They'll likely change their tune rapidly.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#7 Mar 03 2004 at 7:32 AM Rating: Decent
Thank you guys! Now a lot of things become clear to me regarding looting experiences from the past :/

I am not sure if my cleric will be asked to ML as she has to carry around her armor (and I fired the max into WIS at creation of course)but if I sure will stand away from autosplit :)
#8 Mar 03 2004 at 9:16 AM Rating: Decent

IMO, clerics should never ever in a million years be the ML. If they are not healing, they should be medding. Having the cleric running around and looting things, instead of keeping their mana high is just crazy.
#9 Mar 03 2004 at 10:18 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
Avatar
***
3,166 posts
A very useful thread.

I think a lot of LDoN ML's thought the split command was /q
____________________________
Wherever I go - there I am.
#10 Mar 03 2004 at 11:28 AM Rating: Good
**
426 posts
I totally agree that ML is the only way to go in a LDoN goup. But, Patrician, I don't agree that auto split is allways evil. It depends on group and whether you have a regular group or not. In my case, I allways play with the same group which is basically, my wife, my sis-in-law and an in-game friend who has been grouping with us for allmost 2 years now. The wife and I both 2-box, so that mkes a full group. We use an alphabetical loot rotation for our group. I admit this isn't your typical pick-up group. Over the 3 years that we've been doing this we've noted that the loot will even out - evyone usually ends up with about the same amount of plat after selling out. On the few occasions that we've added an "outsider" to our group - by wife and I dropping one of our toons out this has also worked out well. The exception was an in game friend who played a monk - on those occasions we did ML - however, it was a real pain to have to wait around for the ML to go sell out and then return to split. Of course, we haven't done that since PoP - which I'm sure has made that much easier. There were a couple of time that the wife and I got into pick-up groups in SK back before Luclin and the ML went to the treehouses to sell out and was never seen again. So, the point to this is, there's positive's and negative's to both sides of this. No black and white - more of a game play issue, and who your playing with.

EagleFlight/Dyciere
#11 Mar 03 2004 at 11:29 AM Rating: Decent
**
500 posts
I agree 100% that ML should never have autosplit on - it results in both unfair splits with the rest of group and causes weight problems for some classes (monks of course, but a lot of us casters dont have the stg to run around with a lot of small coins as well). Also, having clc be ML makes no sense as there is often to little time to med as is, and looting takes up to much time which will lead to LOM.

I would add that it makes little sense for puller or pacifier to be ML, I played a LDON as chanter the other day with a group of regulars where I was both ML and pacifying to save clc mana. I was often looting while MT was calling for pacify and occasionally got separated from the group (playing in the MM cavern one with all the turns) who moved on to next area while I was looting and I took a wrong turn trying to catch up. MT had to find me 3 times (good thing I play regularly with him). I had a similar problem being ML one time where we had 2 uber tanks who chain pulled and dual fought mobs (normally dont like that but most mobs were down 60% before I could get a slow spell off, so you go with the flow), I ended up basiscally running from one corpse to the next without break and never got to sit and med.

The only time I see manual splits is when a particular item (peridot for clc, rune or scroll for casters, trade item for member) is requested by a member who volunteers to take a lesser cut to make up for lost loot. Most times group agrees to give up item and split what is left, so even this is very rare in my experience.
#12 Mar 03 2004 at 11:36 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,311 posts
I've heard of that /q split command. Very classy (not).

What I don't understand is this, groups have been playing together and splitting loot all along. Is this /q before the split just as common in other pick up groups?

Because of my weight reducing bags and high charisma, I often end up being ML. There have been times when I've gone LD at the end of an adventure. Luckily I was always able to get logged right back in and back into the group to finish selling/splitting. The entire time, I'm thinking 'oh great, now they're going to think I'm one of those ninja looters!'

As an aside, another reason to turn off autosplit when looting is monks have weight restrictions, and we casters have spindly little arms and legs. That coin is heavy!
#13 Mar 03 2004 at 1:06 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
IMO, clerics should never ever in a million years be the ML. If they are not healing, they should be medding. Having the cleric running around and looting things, instead of keeping their mana high is just crazy.


Get high enough level and the right gear and your opinion will probably change. In my normal xp group our druid (main healer for the group) is usually the master looter.

Between VoQ, SD, FT and t-rods she very rarely runs low on mana. Every once in awhile she even nukes just so she won't be sitting at 100% mana.

Back to the main topic. Master looting imo is the way to go. Afterwards it's pretty easy to sell and split.
#14 Mar 03 2004 at 1:27 PM Rating: Good
a good, experienced cleric can ML fine. I grouped with a cleric on a hard last night who was the only healer, the MLer, and was still nuking and meleeign
#15 Mar 03 2004 at 1:35 PM Rating: Decent
*
75 posts
I agree ML is the way to go. But, I am a 65 Cleric and most Ldon that i do i am ML. I have never ran out of mana and i heal, nuke, pacify and loot the whole time. It all depends on the AA's and the equipment you have.

#16 Mar 03 2004 at 1:54 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
Avatar
***
3,166 posts
Quote:
We use an alphabetical loot rotation for our group. I admit this isn't your typical pick-up group.


There is your difference.

By rotating the looting the unfairness is shared and effectively evens out over time.

In a stranger group it is fairer to have autosplit off even when alpha looting. Your corpse - your loot, all of it.
____________________________
Wherever I go - there I am.
#17 Mar 03 2004 at 1:56 PM Rating: Decent
*
136 posts
amastropolo the Magnificent wrote:

IMO, clerics should never ever in a million years be the ML. If they are not healing, they should be medding. Having the cleric running around and looting things, instead of keeping their mana high is just crazy.



My enchanter, bard and cleric carry one bag each on them now to ensure they don't get stuck with the job.
#18 Mar 04 2004 at 7:51 AM Rating: Decent
When hunting in small groups (2-3)in OoM for example I also used the loot rotation and can't say it wasn't as satisfying as anything else - but the loot in OoM sucks for most mobs of course anyway ;-)
#19 Mar 04 2004 at 4:22 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
*
188 posts
Actually the way autoaplit works is to just divide coins regardless of value. So if you have a full group and the mob has 2p 2g 1s 1c then the looter and another each get 1p, 2 folks each get 1g, one gets 1s, and the last gets 1c. Clearly not a fair distribution of the wealth.

Also note that /split will only split among the group members in the same zone. So one reason someone may split manually is someone is LD or not in the same zone. Another reason could be that you have a new person in group that doesn't deserve a share.

As far as not trusting the ML'er to evenly distribute loot manually, how could you really trust them to /split honestly? After all, they can tye whatever they wanted on the /split command.
____________________________
** Visit eqmagicians.com **

[EQ]
Romen Orgi of Sojourners / Magician, Brell Serilis (Cazic Thule) server magelo
Romen of Fippy's Revenge / Magician, Fippy Darkpaw server
Fiella / Magician, Firona Vie server
Mentas of Cursed Asylum / Magician, Test Server magelo

[EQ2x]
Aphalia of The Bronze Age / Wizard

[WoW]
Darkaura / Warlock, Scarlet Crusade
#20 Mar 04 2004 at 7:43 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Romen, pet mage of Jabober wrote:
Actually the way autoaplit works is to just divide coins regardless of value. So if you have a full group and the mob has 2p 2g 1s 1c then the looter and another each get 1p, 2 folks each get 1g, one gets 1s, and the last gets 1c. Clearly not a fair distribution of the wealth.


Um... Half right. It does split each coin type separately (that's what I meand by "it doesn't make change".

However it does not split *any* coins of any type unless there are enough to give one to each character. The only exception is that if there was cash loot, but not enough of any coin to split, it will always give those recieving no share 1cp (it just generates them out of thin air).

In the example you gave, the looter would get 2p, 2g, 1s, 1c. Everyone else would get 1c. Every time.

This is trivially easy to test. The next time you loot a mob with /autosplit on, and you get 2 or 3 pp as your share. Ask the rest of the group what they got. I guarantee you that unless everyone in the group got 1pp, no one will get 1pp. You got that 2 or 3 plat because that was all the plat the mob had and it wasn't enough to split.

Quote:
Also note that /split will only split among the group members in the same zone. So one reason someone may split manually is someone is LD or not in the same zone. Another reason could be that you have a new person in group that doesn't deserve a share.


And this is a problem why? The possiblity that someone might go LD is not a good justification for not at least attempting a fair split. We're all (mostly) adults. We can work around things like LD. I will still get a better share in the long run even if I lose a share anytime I go LD, then if we rely on autosplit for loot.

Um... And obviously you split loot when the group makeup changes. Deal with it. Even with a bit of guesswork by the ML, it'll be more fair then autosplit will be in the long run. And for LDoN, this simply isn't an issue.

Quote:
As far as not trusting the ML'er to evenly distribute loot manually, how could you really trust them to /split honestly? After all, they can tye whatever they wanted on the /split command.


I'm not sure what you mean buy "manually". Most folks are talking about using a ML/split process versus using /autosplit and just looting as we go. Sure. You've got to trust the guy doing the ML. Most dont do a full manual loot anyway. If I got 1200pp on a run, but one of the people isn't present (LD or out of the zone), it's not that hard to just do a /split 1000 and give everyone their shares, then "manually" give the remaining person their 200pp when it's possible.

Same deal with reimbursing costs. If a cleric used up a dozen dots on an adventure, I might subtract 130pp right off the top before doing the split, and then just give that cash to the cleric. There really isn't an issue of chosing between manual split and using the /split command. You use /split when you can, and do it manually when you can't. Not that hard.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#21 Mar 04 2004 at 9:51 PM Rating: Decent
Just for the record - I hear ALL of the time of reagent cost in these share-split-discussions.

But it seems that the f*cking load of "reagent conversation" items that EVERY caster is proud to have seize to function as soon as the caster groups, right? ;-)

Edited, Thu Mar 4 21:51:45 2004 by Leiany
#22 Mar 04 2004 at 10:40 PM Rating: Good
Leiany wrote:
Just for the record - I hear ALL of the time of reagent cost in these share-split-discussions.

But it seems that the f*cking load of "reagent conversation" items that EVERY caster is proud to have seize to function as soon as the caster groups, right? ;-)

Edited, Thu Mar 4 21:51:45 2004 by Leiany


Smiley: confused

What are you trying to say Leiany?

As far Cleric peridots are concerned, I'm certain that every Cleric in Norrath would be completely over the moon if those who wanted buffs just carried a few dots around with them and no PP ever need change hands.

#23 Mar 05 2004 at 1:43 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
Avatar
***
3,166 posts
She meant "Conservation" not "conversation". Most clerics I kknow don't talk to their peridots.

Reagent conservation has a 15% chance of working. Roughly one in 6. Personally I never remember to equip the darned thing and it wouldn't work on virtue anyway.

From past experience it hardly ever activated. I am certainly not going to spend serious cash on buying a reagent conservation 4 item.

So the cleric isn't "coining it" by having an RMB. They may save the one one or two but frequently in buffing a group they save nothing.
____________________________
Wherever I go - there I am.
#24 Mar 05 2004 at 12:12 PM Rating: Decent

ROTF.

I've been with some wacky clerics, but never one that talked to their dots.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 175 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (175)