Conviction
|
Scholar
48 posts
The ac in the spell desciption list 238, it is actually 59.
ellingmar wrote:
The ac in the spell desciption list 238, it is actually 59.
The AC isn't being calculated correctly on our spell translator. I've marked this down as a bug and will fix it when I get some time.
Allakhazam Developer and Admin
For real time update information on Allakhazam, follow me on Twitter!
https://twitter.com/gidono
Or join us via our Discord channel at https://discord.gg/zu9tTS7
For real time update information on Allakhazam, follow me on Twitter!
https://twitter.com/gidono
Or join us via our Discord channel at https://discord.gg/zu9tTS7
14 posts
is the conviction spell no trade? i heard it used to be but i saw it in baz for 12k. i know baz will not let you sell items that are no trade.
It is droppable now
with the release of TSS , all the OoW spells became researchable (except the ancients and the melee tomes)
also , the scrolls players recieve from turning in runes are droppable (except the ancients/tomes). However i don't think you can recieve any scrolls from turning in runes once you've memorized all those spells from that certain rune type.
Edited, Nov 25th 2006 6:11am by DukeLatan
with the release of TSS , all the OoW spells became researchable (except the ancients and the melee tomes)
also , the scrolls players recieve from turning in runes are droppable (except the ancients/tomes). However i don't think you can recieve any scrolls from turning in runes once you've memorized all those spells from that certain rune type.
Edited, Nov 25th 2006 6:11am by DukeLatan
DukeLatan wrote:
It is droppable now
with the release of TSS , all the OoW spells became researchable (except the ancients and the melee tomes)
also , the scrolls players recieve from turning in runes are droppable (except the ancients). However i don't think you can recieve any scrolls from turning in runes once you've memorized all those spells from that certain rune type.
Edited, Nov 19th 2006 at 3:34am PST by DukeLatan
with the release of TSS , all the OoW spells became researchable (except the ancients and the melee tomes)
also , the scrolls players recieve from turning in runes are droppable (except the ancients). However i don't think you can recieve any scrolls from turning in runes once you've memorized all those spells from that certain rune type.
Edited, Nov 19th 2006 at 3:34am PST by DukeLatan
Added the recipe and updated the item.
23 posts
lvl 61 for it to stick
Scholar
16 posts
who do you turn the lesser muramite runes to?
all runes for OoW spells are turned in to Karsor the Mad in Draniks Scar, he stand next to a tree kid of west and a bit south from the PoD's
9 posts
What are they refering to on slot 3 to increase HPs?
Well, paladin spells like Brells increase you MAX HP, but you have to heal or regen up to fill in those MAX hp, with actual life. You get brells cast on you, and you'll be at 95% life, or something like that, even though nothing has hit you.
This spell adds to your max HP, AND heals you for the exact amount necessary to fill up those new HP. So when this is cast on you, you'll still be at 100% life.
This spell adds to your max HP, AND heals you for the exact amount necessary to fill up those new HP. So when this is cast on you, you'll still be at 100% life.
15 posts
had this spell cast on my 42 warrior along with talisman of wunshi and other GM buffs on halloween i went straight to CoM to tank after i got some items
hmmm musta been a GM thing or a special Halloween thing, cause the hard limit is 61
Edited, Sat Jul 2 08:33:28 2005
Edited, Sat Jul 2 08:33:28 2005
3 posts
I KNOW REPROACH (dd)IS FIRST SPELL,PANOPY OF VIE IS 2ND (DAM.MIT.), AND CONVICTION IS 6TH ANYONE KNOW REST OF THE ORDER SPELLS ARE GIVEN?
Scholar
36 posts
I do wish Allakhazam had the 67 spells listed in the proper order. I was anxious to get conviction and since it was listed 2nd I assumed it was the second spell you would receive. Boy was I bummed when I got Panoply of Vie instead.
They do have the proper order listed under Omens spell quest and the order for cleric lvl 67 is
- Reproach, Panoply of Vie, Sermon of Reproach, Pious Elixir, Blessing of Devotion, Conviction.
I had to turn in 6 lessor runes to finally get conviction.
They do have the proper order listed under Omens spell quest and the order for cleric lvl 67 is
- Reproach, Panoply of Vie, Sermon of Reproach, Pious Elixir, Blessing of Devotion, Conviction.
I had to turn in 6 lessor runes to finally get conviction.
they DO have them listed in the proper order, if you click the link for OoW spells quest, the listing in the spell lists is not the order you will get them
2 posts
what lvl do you have to be for it to stick
61 for single, 62 for group version
Scholar
21 posts
There has been a rumor circulating that the reason for the removal of reagents from symbol and aegolism lines is that there are new items availalbe in oow that will have right click mana free Casts of spells from these lines ... can anyone confirm this yet?
Even if that was true, which I've seen no actual evidence it would in no way be reason for them to remove peridots from the Aego and symbol lines. The reason I say this is the simple fact that there are countless clicky items and even Proc's that REQUIRE you to have the reagent needed for the normal spell in order for it to work. One popular example is the gate ammy requiring that the user have a quintessence of knowledge in order for it to work. Clicky and proc Rune spells also require that you have the proper reagents for them.
So this is not a likely reason for them to have removed it. A much more likely reason is the fact that all the uber guilds that they invited to the summit complained about the number of dots they go thru for raids and such, this has also been a very big complaint of players in general.
So this is not a likely reason for them to have removed it. A much more likely reason is the fact that all the uber guilds that they invited to the summit complained about the number of dots they go thru for raids and such, this has also been a very big complaint of players in general.
Proc rune effects DO NOT require the reagent. Example - Bloodied Beserker's Blade from Seru - Procs Rune III. You DO NOT need stacks of jaspers for it to work. How do I know? I own one. I wish people actually knew from experiece, rather than posting EQ urban legends.
Reagent free buffs is something the cleric community has been asking for for a long time. If you check out the class forums on Sony's site you will see that this was under evaluation for some time before they decided to implement it.
What runes does one need for the level 67 spells?
Lesser Muramite Runes
49 posts
As of 14 Sep 04 per patch message, Aegolism line of spells no longer requires a reagent.
I would think so why change it now
44 posts
I assume this spell will still cost a peridot?
probubly not considering Virtue no longer costs a reagent. AYE!! WHERE?HOW can i get this spell? i'm really interested EXACTLY how I get this since everyone before be has been too afraid to ask this question. what do I turn into whom? Where exactly do I get the 'item' to turn into whom?
Edited, Fri Sep 17 00:24:23 2004
Edited, Fri Sep 17 00:24:23 2004
Give a lesser muramite rune to Karsor the mad (in dranic's scar). However, this is the LAST level 67 spell you will receive, so you'll need 6 runes before you see this.
Edited, Sun Oct 3 16:42:43 2004
Edited, Sun Oct 3 16:42:43 2004
Free account required to post
You must log in or create an account to post messages.© 2024 Fanbyte LLC