Spell: Haunting Corpse  

Creates


Icon Count Item Name
EverQuest icon 1 x Spell: Haunting Corpse [crafted]

Ingredients


Icon Count Item Name Obtain Info
EverQuest icon 1 x Bone Chips Foraged, Summoned, Bought, Quested, Dropped
EverQuest icon 1 x Conjuring Thickener Crafted, Bought
EverQuest icon 1 x Ink Additive of the Nameless Bought
EverQuest icon 1 x Ink of the Companion Crafted, Bought
EverQuest icon 1 x Pristine Fine Hide Crafted
EverQuest icon 1 x Quill of the Arch Lich Crafted, Bought

Stats


No-Fail Combine: No
Tradeskill: Research
Counts Toward 350 Skill: No
Learned Recipe: No
DNL (Not Learned) Recipe: No
Innate Recipe: No
Trivial:70
Race: Not Set
Class: ALL
Expansion: Original Original
Daybreak Recipe ID: Not Set
Recipe Created: 2003-08-03 01:42:10
Recipe Last Updated: 2020-07-12 18:08:38


Sub-Combines

Sub-Combines - Premium Only
Post Comment
Non Functioing Recipe
# Dec 11 2007 at 3:41 PM Rating: Decent
*
74 posts
I have had no success with this recipe for my young Necromancer. I know that Sony recently change the way research is performed but I can find no new recipe listing for this spell.

-S
Non Functioing Recipe
# Dec 11 2007 at 4:04 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,998 posts
Scaryb wrote:
I have had no success with this recipe for my young Necromancer. I know that Sony recently change the way research is performed but I can find no new recipe listing for this spell.

-S


Updated to the new recipe.
trivial
# Aug 06 2004 at 7:26 AM Rating: Decent
trivial is between 62 and 71
the point of this
# Jul 01 2004 at 6:21 AM Rating: Decent
The only point that I see in doing this is to raise you skill in reaserch, but as I am sure there are higher lvl reaserch spells with cheaper components that will do the same, I tend to agree that this is a waste of time.

Aeryn
the point of this
# Dec 19 2007 at 10:53 AM Rating: Decent
this spell is not a waste of time.... not a a young Necromancer than needs his new pet...
whats the point
# May 04 2004 at 1:07 PM Rating: Decent
the words cost so much to get and are only for this one spell. no other spell requires the use of these words
Huge Waste
# Feb 05 2004 at 2:04 PM Rating: Decent
31 posts
I know the trivial is over 35, since I failed three times to make this spell. Cost me 450pp for the words. Totally frustrating. I'm about to give up and stick with the lvl 20 pet until I can get the one at 29. What a joke to have a lvl 24 spell cost anywhere from 400pp (vendor purchased) to 1k pp (attempts to make - with continual research failures). Nothing about this exercise is fair. The drops are amazingly rare, the research level is entirely too high, and the spell isn't that great to begin with.
trivial
# Oct 31 2003 at 2:35 PM Rating: Decent


Edited, Fri Oct 31 14:37:38 2003
What's the actual trivial on this recipe?
# Oct 13 2003 at 2:17 PM Rating: Decent
*
115 posts
As of September 13, 2003, the trivial for this spell is listed as 0, but I'm assuming that isn't right. Does anyone know the actual trivial?
RE: What's the actual trivial on this recipe?
# Oct 31 2003 at 2:38 PM Rating: Decent
71 I believe
Post Comment

Free account required to post

You must log in or create an account to post messages.