Item GlossaryEverQuest icon

Robe of Mana  
 


Slot: CHEST
AC: 8
CHA: +2 INT: +5
SV FIRE: +10
WT: 0.0 Size: TINY
Class: NEC WIZ MAG ENC
Race: ALL
Slot 1, Type 7 (General: Group)
Slot 2, Type 21 (Special Ornamentation)

Item Type:Armor
Appearance:Plain Robe
Tint:
 
Color (RGB):0, 153, 255
Stackable:No
Merchant Value:10 pp 0 gp 0 sp 0 cp
Tribute:30
Lucy Entry By:NoJokes
Item Updated By:SwiftyMUSE
Source:Live
IC Last Updated:2021-12-11 10:04:03
Page Updated:Sat Sep 7th, 2019

Expansion: Legacy of Ykesha Legacy of Ykesha


Average Price: No Data Pricing Data...
Rarity: Common
Level to Attain: 1

[Comments ]

Crafted: This item is crafted by players.
Send a correction
Post Comment
...
# Oct 02 2004 at 8:13 AM Rating: Default
*
210 posts
Got Mana?
heard
# Sep 03 2003 at 6:21 PM Rating: Default
i heard alot of the naqmed come from a random name generator and they dont actually pick or even check the names. this is just sumtin i heard no idea if its true
mana is as mana does
# Jul 13 2003 at 6:54 AM Rating: Decent
If I am right, this has an effect that does direct damage to you but adds mana to your mana pool. It was selling in the bazaar somewhere around 100k on Ayonae Ro.
RE: mana is as mana does
# Aug 21 2003 at 12:21 PM Rating: Decent
Your thinking of the Mana Robe, not Robe of Mana. (https://everquest.allakhazam.com/db/item.html?item=2117) The Mana Robe returns 20 mana for 60 hps.
LOL
# Mar 17 2003 at 10:29 AM Rating: Decent
heck beforei cliked on the link i said to myself " this gonna be sotmhign like 0 INT and liek 80+ mana robe"

well....

I gues what name REALY means is that you NEED MANA. put on this robe and you will be in deep need of mana, hence the ROBE of MANA =)
Cute
# Mar 16 2003 at 8:48 AM Rating: Excellent
Yeah let's hope this is a typo, there's not even enough INT to justify calling it a robe of mana hehe. Nice fire resist though.
Cute
# Mar 14 2003 at 7:33 PM Rating: Excellent
*
75 posts
A robe of mana without any +mana :p
#REDACTED, Posted: Mar 15 2003 at 1:10 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Yeah... it's like you'd expect Verant to make sense. Go figure.
#REDACTED, Posted: Mar 15 2003 at 1:13 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Why blame Verant for Sony's mistake? Verant doesn't have responsiblity for EQ anymore, Sony's 989 studios now does all the programming.
Post Comment

Free account required to post

You must log in or create an account to post messages.