Item GlossaryEverQuest icon

Rune of Attraction  
 


This item can be used in tradeskills.
WT: 0.1 Size: TINY
Class: ALL
Race: ALL
Item Type:Combinable
Stackable:1000
Merchant Value:1 pp 3 gp 0 sp 0 cp
Tribute:1
Lucy Entry By:Agamenoar
Item Updated By:SwiftyMUSE
Source:Live
IC Last Updated:2019-09-12 09:58:32
Page Updated:Wed Aug 7th, 2019


Average Price: No Data Pricing Data...
Rarity: Global
Level to Attain: 30

[Drops | Recipes | Comments ]

Drops: This item is found on creatures.


Used in 1 recipe.
Recipe list - Premium only.

Zone(s) Found In:
Screenshot

Uploaded October 1st, 2015 by SCindyee
Send a correction
Post Comment
research
# Jul 12 2014 at 6:33 PM Rating: Decent
2 posts
Makes celestial essence. rune + celestial solvent in mixing bowl ( no fail )
Lodi
# May 09 2007 at 5:49 PM Rating: Decent
22 posts
Dropped off Lodizal in Iceclad
Lodi
# Nov 29 2008 at 7:16 AM Rating: Decent
20 posts
Still dropping from Lodizal, just got one the other day. This rune is used for something other than spellcraft.
____________________________
Do not pay attention to anything I say.
different types but they all seem to work
# May 27 2006 at 6:34 AM Rating: Excellent
Scholar
**
463 posts
Like many others, I had two Runes of Attraction that wouldn't stack. I was able to use both of them to craft Spell: Gravity Flux. The names of the recipes are actually different; one of them is Spell: Gravity Flux (Rune of Attraction - Seb). I'll bet the third type works also, I wonder what its recipe is called?

The /outputfile inventory command also shows that the two I had use different ID numbers. One was #11748. The one that's apparently called "Seb" was #11777.

Edited to note that the spells created by the two recipes DO stack.

Edited, Sat May 27 06:28:08 2006
____________________________
Sukrasisx (105 monk) / Terrwini (67 druid) / Teviron (59 shadowknight) / Wizbeau (36 wizard)
-- Mystic Coercion, EMarr
RE: different types but they all seem to work
# Jun 04 2006 at 2:51 PM Rating: Excellent
Ungainly Ninja
Avatar
****
6,998 posts
Time to beat SOE developers soundly about the head and shoulders. Both versions are listed now, with notes under the recipes they're used in.

Edited, Sun Jun 4 14:46:17 2006
Dopped
# Apr 15 2006 at 9:44 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
53 posts
Dropped today in Old Sebilis of a Froglok jin shaman.
Everfrost Peaks
# Jul 10 2005 at 3:02 AM Rating: Decent
This Rune of Attraction is also a rare drop in Everfrost Peaks on the Mammoths. About a 1 in 40 chance of getting one.
____________________________
Heiffen Proudfoot: 35 Halfling Ranger (Maelin Starpyre Server)
Aunory Bluebeard: 58 Dwarven Knight (Maelin Starpyre Server)
Maelinye: 19 Dark Elven Necromancer (Maelin Starpyre Server)
3 that dont stack
# Aug 16 2004 at 11:03 AM Rating: Decent
i have 3 different rune of attraction's that will not stack with each other /shrug
Skyfire
# Apr 09 2004 at 6:17 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
42 posts
Dropped off a wyvern in Skyfire, also.
research
# Mar 05 2004 at 7:03 PM Rating: Decent
Used in wizard research for 2 spells:
Levitate, spell level 24.
Trivial 71. Runes: Attraction, Expulsion

Gravity Flux, spell level 44.
Trivial 166. Runes: Attraction, Rathe, Inverse
____________________________
Baron Vaserian Thunderstorm, Sorcerer
RE: research
# Mar 12 2004 at 4:41 PM Rating: Decent
2 posts
Are you familiar with an Expert Rune (complete)?

I have found one but can find no information on what it is used for.
RE: research
# Nov 10 2004 at 7:05 PM Rating: Decent
*
137 posts
I believe expert runes are part of the process in which Researches use practice runes to get skill ups. Thru the course of practicing, you combine and get "complete" runes and I think expert rune is one of these. I could be wrong though.
____________________________
"...may have been the losing side; still not convinced it was the wrong one."
2 different ones?
# Feb 19 2004 at 5:43 PM Rating: Decent
I collect runes for research and i keep them on my mule, i picked one of these up in an ldon the other day and when i went to put it on my mule it wouldn't stack with my other 3 Rune of Attraction. Anyone else have this problem? Just a bug or is there some reason for it? You know, like Runes of Fulguration
____________________________
Baron Vaserian Thunderstorm, Sorcerer
RE: 2 different ones?
# Mar 03 2004 at 3:48 AM Rating: Decent
12 posts
Yeah, I also have Runes of Attraction that will not stack with each other. I do notice that "Rune of Attraction" is used for two different Wiz spells -- one level 24, the other level 44. Maybe these are actually different runes. However, I checked what a vendor would offer me for them and it was the same for both (about 1p2g).
RE: 2 different ones?
# Jul 12 2004 at 2:14 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
342 posts
Checked both with Identify and they give identical Lore: "Rune of Attraction". *shrug* Go figure.
RE: 2 different ones?
# Apr 18 2004 at 11:08 AM Rating: Decent
4 posts
Me too... I have Runes of Attraction that won't stack. Any idea how to tell which one to use to research which spell?
Levitate
# Dec 07 2003 at 9:25 PM Rating: Decent
*
227 posts
Used for 24th lvl Magician spell Levitate
RE: Levitate
# Mar 03 2004 at 1:10 AM Rating: Good
*
202 posts
Mages never get the spell Levitate at any level. They get a conjuration spell at 39 called Summon Ring of Flight that will summon a NO RENT ring that has 2 charges of levitation though.

According to the spell description, Levitate, no class gets it at 24 so I have no idea where you got that info.
____________________________
Tarquelian Pyromanseer
67 Arch Convoker
In Via Damnum
Xev

Massacarri
23 Mystic
Innothule
RE: Levitate
# May 25 2004 at 9:24 AM Rating: Decent
*
137 posts
I know where they got the info...from EQTraders... this is their listing:

Spell: Levitate
MAGIC ITEM
Level Needed: 24
Skill: Alteration
Mana Cost: 30
WT: 0.1 Size: SMALL
Class: WIZ
Race: ALL
Components: rune of attraction, rune of expulsion
In: lexicon, sorcerer's lexicon
Yield: 1
This combine may only be made by Wizards

direct link:
HERE

Now, "level needed" could mean the level required to DO the combine, but if you're not that familiar with EQT I can see how someone may think it's a level 24 spell.



Edited, Tue May 25 10:25:35 2004
____________________________
"...may have been the losing side; still not convinced it was the wrong one."
Nadox
# Sep 06 2003 at 2:43 AM Rating: Excellent
15 posts
Got one of these in Nadox, can't remember quite which mob... not a luggald, probably a Blackhand... maybe even one of the tunnel digger ones.
____________________________
Iroke (Uragirimono), Wood Elf, 12 Druid/12Provisioner - Lucan DLere
Post Comment

Free account required to post

You must log in or create an account to post messages.