Item GlossaryEverQuest icon

Scimitar of Shissar Slaying  
 

No Trade Placeable
Slot: PRIMARY SECONDARY
Skill: 1H Slashing Atk Delay: 19
DMG: 15 Dmg Bonus: 33 AC: 25
Cold DMG: 1
Bane DMG: Shissar +1
This item is placeable in yards, guild yards, houses and guild halls.
STR: +10 DEX: +10 AGI: +10 HP: +100 MANA: +100 ENDUR: +100
SV FIRE: +5 SV DISEASE: +5 SV COLD: +5 SV MAGIC: +5 SV POISON: +5
Recommended level of 60.
WT: 1.0 Size: SMALL
Class: WAR PAL RNG SHD BRD ROG
Race: ALL
Slot 1, Type 4 (Weapon: General)
Slot 2, Type 20 (Ornamentation)

Item Type:1H Slashing
Stackable:No
Lucy Entry By:unknown
Item Updated By:SwiftyMUSE
Source:Live
IC Last Updated:2021-07-27 09:23:51
Page Updated:Thu Oct 9th, 2008

Expansion: Shadows of Luclin Shadows of Luclin


Rarity: Rare
Level to Attain: 60

[Drops | Comments ]

Drops

This item is found on creatures.



Zone(s) Found In:


Zone Name
Vex Thal
Screenshot

Uploaded November 27th, 2008
Send a correction
Post Comment
No Longer Drops?
# Dec 22 2019 at 9:39 PM Rating: Excellent
**
528 posts
I -think- this item no longer drops.
WTF....
# Aug 24 2004 at 2:25 AM Rating: Default
What is the worse part is this weapon Should have dropped in a zone any other zone before you had to farm SSRA for the dam key /flip Sony
how it really works
# Aug 11 2004 at 9:58 AM Rating: Decent
i know that this is an old thread, but i have yet to read a post of how bane dmg actually works. mobs that can only be hit by weapons with a certain bane dmg on them (ie the emp), will take the full dmg of the weapon that has such bane on it. so the emp, being hit by this weapon, will take the full 16dmg. not just the 15 bane. this holds true for all forms of specific creature bane weapons. lord seru is the same way. hope i cleared up some confusion
#REDACTED, Posted: Jul 10 2004 at 8:23 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) long legged freaky slimy fart nogen licken but smelling creepy green peace of bag puke...
#REDACTED, Posted: Jul 10 2004 at 8:19 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) fart that no good eat my ****
droprate
# Apr 20 2004 at 6:58 AM Rating: Default
this **** doesn't drop anymore it seems (stupid loot anyway), or it's just rare as ****.
Facts
# Jan 18 2003 at 1:24 PM Rating: Decent
This weap is 15/19 versus Emperor Ssraezsha.
This weap is 16/19 versus normal shissar.
This weap is 1/19 versus ANY OTHER mob that is NOT shissar.
RE: Facts
# Feb 24 2003 at 3:50 AM Rating: Good
Yes, facts are good.

This weap is 16/19 versus Emperor Ssraeshza.
This weap is 16/19 against normal shissar.
This weap is 1/19 versus ANY OTHER mob that is NOT shissar.

(Note the corrected spelling of Ssraeshza.)
RE: Facts
# Apr 20 2004 at 6:56 AM Rating: Excellent
Dalynia is indeed the correct poster, I don't backstab for 550ish with an 8dmg dagger (read: corrupted piercer).


Edited, Tue May 4 03:53:25 2004
RE: Facts
# Apr 11 2003 at 2:02 PM Rating: Default
Emp only takes bane damage. Original post was correct.
RE: Facts
# Sep 25 2003 at 4:51 PM Rating: Good
The original poster (and most of this thread) is incorrect. The post that you all have rated so poorly is in fact correct.

If you want another discussion on bane weapons, please refer to the Safehouse.... This link is a lenghty discussion on how it works. Note that although some people do believe it is just the bane that is hitting in the begining by the end of the thread everyone agrees it is the whole damage of the weapon.

So for those people with thier filters on, this weapon is a 16/19 against the emperor, not a 15/19.

I am sure you can find some spelling or grammar errors in my post, but that doesn't make it false.

Edited, Thu Sep 25 17:53:34 2003
#REDACTED, Posted: Mar 21 2003 at 7:59 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Hi
RE: Facts
# Apr 20 2004 at 6:54 AM Rating: Default
this post = lolz
RE: Facts
# Mar 05 2003 at 1:31 PM Rating: Decent
Just as this is a useless post, the fact that you decided to correct somebodies spelling is dumb...
RE: Facts
# Aug 01 2005 at 3:37 PM Rating: Default
They also posted the corrected damage, which is very important to note. Bane damage affects all damage on a weapon, regardless of certain immunities. Lord Seru is the most notable test subject that proves this.
full circle
# Oct 04 2002 at 11:30 AM Rating: Decent
So you bust your tail killing the Emp, so you can finish your VT key, so you can get a sword that will help you kill the Emp.. Makes perfect sense to me.
RE: full circle
# May 01 2004 at 10:35 AM Rating: Decent
Would seem that getting a great bane wpn against Emp. after you have had to kill him to get into VT is a bit redundant, however, most guilds have to kill Emp MANY MANY MANY times to get everyone keyed for VT that doesnt's even include any new recruits since your last Emp kill. GREAT weapon to have in the bank.
RE: full circle
# Oct 04 2002 at 5:02 PM Rating: Default
Good point.
Still though, from what I know only the bane portion of weapons works on the emperor, and a good deal of the quested ones aren't as high as 16 damage vs shissar (the one handers)

And who is there to forbid farming emperor for more loot while alternating him with VT mobs.
Just my 1cp
RE: full circle
# Oct 11 2002 at 2:20 PM Rating: Decent
So just to clear things up, this weapon is only 16/19 againts the emperor and other sstemple mobs?It won't work againts mobs in vt?

Takata K'Trazz LVL 58 Darkelf Myrmidon of Rallos Zek
Erollisi Marr
http://www.magelo.com/eq_view_profile.html?num=251453
RE: full circle
# Sep 14 2003 at 10:41 AM Rating: Default
15/19 against the emp... 16/19 against shissar... emp only takes bane dmg... all other mobs- 1/19
RE: full circle
# Aug 15 2004 at 8:19 PM Rating: Default
correct since emp is immune to all melee dmg except bane he only takes the 15 where as all other shissar take the full 16 the weapon is poo unles you are fighting some sort of shissar and seing as how i'm posting after GoD and pretty close to OOW expansion the weapon sucks against everything but emp.
RE: full circle
# Nov 01 2002 at 10:59 AM Rating: Default
this sword will be 16/19 verse ALL Shissar
RE: full circle
# Dec 16 2002 at 1:03 AM Rating: Decent
bane on 1hs is 7, 2hs is 23, making the bane on this over double of what you'll see on the shissar 1hs.
question?
# Oct 04 2002 at 10:00 AM Rating: Decent
Never really understood how bane dmg works..so will this be a 15dmg 19delay weapon against shissar? I know my summoned hammer Hammer of Judgement is 14dmg 19delay with 10dmg bane undead..i hit normals for average of 40dmg or so but undead my highest melee dmg in 100dmg.well good hunting and safe journey to all.
RE: question?
# Oct 06 2002 at 1:47 PM Rating: Decent
*
105 posts
To answer you bane damage question on the cleric summoned hammer, the hammer is 14/19 against non undead, and 24/19 against undead. If there was some undead boss mob that could only be hit by undead bane damage, your summoned hammer would be 10/19 against it (because the regular damage wouldnt affect it.)

This particular shissar weapon would be 16/19 against shissar mobs, and 15/19 against the emperor (since he's immune to the 1 regular damage.)
RE: question?
# Oct 10 2002 at 2:04 PM Rating: Decent
*
105 posts
slight mistake, cleric hammer has 18 delay.
RE: question?
# Oct 04 2002 at 1:48 PM Rating: Decent
This is a 1/19 weapon.

As I undersand it, the bane damage is an actual bonus, so it's better than just changing it to 16/19, but then you add in all of your other bits like dmg bonus, strength, etc as normal.

Just an observation
# Oct 04 2002 at 3:33 AM Rating: Default
29 posts
Silly question: why can't druids use it? Please don't get me wrong: i don't think they should get it (i can clearly see it getting better use by other classes) but it just struck me as odd that a scimitar cannot be used by a druid.

Guine Vere
35th woodelf druidess on Vazaelle

OMG, maybe druids are in reality descendants of Shissar and therefor cannot wield it without killing themselves :)

Edited, Fri Oct 4 09:18:49 2002
Hm
# Oct 04 2002 at 1:59 AM Rating: Default
Well, roleplaying wise it would make sense that great warrior races are invulnerable to weapons crafted from inferior alloys to their own.

See it as: This sword is the only weapon good enough to harm me.

Very nice Ranger sword
(Warriors get a 16/19 off Emperor if Im not mistaken)
Could use some form of a DD proc though.
Where lotsa armor
# Oct 03 2002 at 11:00 PM Rating: Default
Maybe the akheva has on gloves? If I were a shissar I would definately be in body suit or something if I was running around using one of these

And I ment wear :)

Edited, Thu Oct 3 23:44:15 2002
Shissar carrying bane weapons for themselves
# Oct 03 2002 at 6:00 PM Rating: Default
Anyone ever wonder why a Shissar (for ex) would caryr a weapon that would inflict extra dmg upon itself? I mean, a simple clumy moment, dropping it on their toes, and now their leg is falling off.

Edited, Thu Oct 3 18:45:23 2002
RE: Shissar carrying bane weapons for themselves
# Oct 04 2002 at 9:59 PM Rating: Decent
Perhaps this sword is carried for use against other Shissar. After all, they are immune to lesser weapons, right?
RE: Shissar carrying bane weapons for themselves
# Oct 04 2002 at 11:35 AM Rating: Decent
that would work... if shissar had TOES AND LEGS!
RE: Shissar carrying bane weapons for themselves
# Sep 17 2003 at 10:38 PM Rating: Decent
maybe thats what happenned to their toes and legs...
RE: Shissar carrying bane weapons for themselves
# Oct 03 2002 at 9:29 PM Rating: Default
If a Shissar could cut off his toe or his leg, that would be something to see!

Think real hard for a moment...you can do it!

Edited, Thu Oct 3 22:13:11 2002
RE: Shissar carrying bane weapons for themselves
# Oct 03 2002 at 6:17 PM Rating: Default
Well, Diabo Xi Xin Thall (a Greater Akheva) drops the Dark Mace of Thought with 8 bane damage versus Greater Akheva. I wonder how he can wield it without burning his fingers or something like that :P
RE: Shissar carrying bane weapons for themselves
# Oct 04 2002 at 6:39 PM Rating: Decent
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer... I think that sort of philosophy works here. If I were vulnerabel to something I would get as much of it as possible and hide it away.
RE: Shissar carrying bane weapons for themselves
# Oct 03 2002 at 8:50 PM Rating: Default
Well, say you were shissar, would you want these babies running around where anyone could grab them and use against you? Or would you want to use them yourself so they would have to kill you to get them. If they made Elf bane swords i would carry them.

Tyreil Truepath
Nice
# Oct 03 2002 at 4:32 PM Rating: Default
This weapon is really good against shissar =), Turns into a 16-19 or 15-19 against the king Leezard.
#REDACTED, Posted: Oct 03 2002 at 4:58 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Does this work against emperor?
#REDACTED, Posted: Oct 03 2002 at 5:23 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Ya might wanna try that Greenmist again, cause it should work against all Shissar...
Post Comment

Free account required to post

You must log in or create an account to post messages.